These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28507355)

  • 1. Estimation of uncertainty measurement - A prerequisite of ISO1589 accreditation for clinical laboratories.
    Iqbal S; Ijaz A; Sharafat S
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2017 May; 67(5):701-705. PubMed ID: 28507355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Uncertainty of measurement for 14 immunoassay analytes: application to laboratory result interpretation.
    Çubukçu HC; Yavuz Ö; Devrim E
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2019; 79(1-2):117-122. PubMed ID: 30626224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Description of a generally applicable model for the evaluation of uncertainty of measurement in clinical chemistry.
    Kristiansen J
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Oct; 39(10):920-31. PubMed ID: 11758604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An approach for estimating measurement uncertainty in medical laboratories using data from long-term quality control and external quality assessment schemes.
    Padoan A; Antonelli G; Aita A; Sciacovelli L; Plebani M
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Oct; 55(11):1696-1701. PubMed ID: 28245184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Uncertainty evaluation in clinical chemistry, immunoassay, hematology and coagulation analytes using only external quality assessment data.
    Qin Y; Zhou R; Wang W; Yin H; Yang Y; Yue Y; Tong Q; Liu L; Jin Y; Shi Y; Zhang S; Zhang J; Zhang R; Zuo C; Jia T; Wang N; Wang Q
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2018 Aug; 56(9):1447-1457. PubMed ID: 29683797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Defining acceptable limits for the metrological traceability of specific measurands.
    Bais R; Armbruster D; Jansen RT; Klee G; Panteghini M; Passarelli J; Sikaris KA;
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2013 May; 51(5):973-9. PubMed ID: 23525873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Different top-down approaches to estimate measurement uncertainty of whole blood tacrolimus mass concentration values.
    Rigo-Bonnin R; Blanco-Font A; Canalias F
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jul; 57():56-61. PubMed ID: 29750938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is the combination of trueness and precision in one expression meaningful? On the use of total error and uncertainty in clinical chemistry.
    Kallner A
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2016 Aug; 54(8):1291-7. PubMed ID: 26812796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties of Immunoassays Analytes According to Biological Variation Databases.
    Kilinckaya MF; Turhan T
    Clin Lab; 2022 Sep; 68(9):. PubMed ID: 36125135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bias in clinical chemistry.
    Theodorsson E; Magnusson B; Leito I
    Bioanalysis; 2014; 6(21):2855-75. PubMed ID: 25486232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement uncertainty in clinical chemistry: ISO 20914 versus nordtest or intermediate precision versus bias.
    Nurlu N; Cat A; Ucar KT
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2024 May; 84(3):147-153. PubMed ID: 38742707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The top-down approach to measurement uncertainty: which formula should we use in laboratory medicine?
    Martinello F; Snoj N; Skitek M; Jerin A
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2020 Jun; 30(2):020101. PubMed ID: 32292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. APLAC interpretation and guidance on the estimation of uncertainty of measurement in testing.
    Robertson M; Chan TS
    J AOAC Int; 2003; 86(5):1070-6. PubMed ID: 14632412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two evaluation budgets for the measurement uncertainty of glucose in clinical chemistry.
    Chen H; Zhang L; Bi X; Deng X
    Korean J Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 31(3):167-71. PubMed ID: 21779190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of Coefficients of Variation for Clinical Chemistry Tests Based on Internal Quality Control Data Across 5,425 Laboratories in China From 2013 to 2022.
    Wang W; Zhang Z; Zhang C; Zhao H; Yuan S; Liu J; Dong N; Wang Z; Kang F
    Ann Lab Med; 2024 May; 44(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 38014482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sigma metrics used to assess analytical quality of clinical chemistry assays: importance of the allowable total error (TEa) target.
    Hens K; Berth M; Armbruster D; Westgard S
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2014 Jul; 52(7):973-80. PubMed ID: 24615486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Practical application of biological variation and Sigma metrics quality models to evaluate 20 chemistry analytes on the Beckman Coulter AU680.
    Tran MT; Hoang K; Greaves RF
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Nov; 49(16-17):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 27527571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of 20 clinical chemistry and 12 immunoassay analytes in terms of total analytical error and measurement uncertainty.
    Balık AR; Gücel F
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2021 Nov; 81(7):517-522. PubMed ID: 34314276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement approach for estimating uncertainty: an appraisal.
    Kristiansen J
    Clin Chem; 2003 Nov; 49(11):1822-9. PubMed ID: 14578313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Point of view regarding traceability and measurement uncertainty in medical laboratory accreditation].
    Kubono K
    Rinsho Byori; 2009 Jun; 57(6):584-92. PubMed ID: 19621793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.