These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2850825)

  • 1. 'A double-blind clinical trial to determine the importance of pumice prophylaxis on fissure sealant retention'.
    Levinkind M; Auger D
    Br Dent J; 1988 Dec; 165(12):422. PubMed ID: 2850825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 'A double-blind clinical trial to determine the importance of pumice prophylaxis on fissure sealant retention'.
    Donnan MN; Ball IA
    Br Dent J; 1989 Feb; 166(4):109-10. PubMed ID: 2537649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A double-blind clinical trial to determine the importance of pumice prophylaxis on fissure sealant retention.
    Donnan MF; Ball IA
    Br Dent J; 1988 Oct; 165(8):283-6. PubMed ID: 2973794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of prophylaxis agents on the shear bond strength of a fissure sealant.
    Bogert TR; Garcia-Godoy F
    Pediatr Dent; 1992; 14(1):50-1. PubMed ID: 1502117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of different methods of cleaning and preparing occlusal fissure surface before placement of pit and fissure sealants: An in vivo study.
    Hegde RJ; Coutinho RC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2016; 34(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 27080958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microleakage assessment of pit and fissure sealant with and without the use of pumice prophylaxis.
    Ansari G; Oloomi K; Eslami B
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2004 Jul; 14(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 15242384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of occlusal fissure cleansing methods and sealant micromorphology.
    Pope BD; Garcia-Godoy F; Summitt JB; Chan DD
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1996; 63(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 8853820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of self-etching sealant on noncontaminated and saliva-contaminated enamel.
    ; ; ;
    Pediatr Dent; 2011; 33(7):479-83. PubMed ID: 22353406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of six different methods of cleaning and preparing occlusal fissure surface before placement of pit and fissure sealant: an in vitro study.
    Agrawal A; Shigli A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 22565518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of different prophylaxis methods on sealant adhesion.
    Sol E; Espasa E; Boj JR; Canalda C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):211-4. PubMed ID: 11314145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fissure micromorphology and sealant adaptation after occlusal enameloplasty.
    Xalabarde A; Garcia-Godoy F; Boj JR; Canaida C
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 20(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 9151622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retention of sealants.
    Smith WP
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 May; 140(5):516-7; author reply 517. PubMed ID: 19411513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of the effects of toothbrushing and handpiece prophylaxis on retention of sealants.
    Kolavic Gray S; Griffin SO; Malvitz DM; Gooch BF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Jan; 140(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 19119165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pit and fissure sealant application: updating the technique.
    Waggoner WF; Siegal M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Mar; 127(3):351-61, quiz 391-2. PubMed ID: 8819782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature.
    Simonsen RJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(5):393-414. PubMed ID: 12412954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of pumice, fissure enameloplasty and air abrasion on sealant microleakage.
    Blackwood JA; Dilley DC; Roberts MW; Swift EJ
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):199-203. PubMed ID: 12064490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial.
    Khare M; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2017 Nov; 27(6):444-453. PubMed ID: 28024165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of pit and fissure sealants bonded with different adhesive systems: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Erbas Unverdi G; Atac SA; Cehreli ZC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Sep; 21(7):2235-2243. PubMed ID: 27900529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vitro evaluation of different techniques of enamel preparation for pit and fissure sealing.
    Courson F; Renda AM; Attal JP; Bouter D; Ruse D; Degrange M
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 15008338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined Effect of Enamel Deproteinization and Intermediate Bonding in the Retention of Pit and Fissure Sealants in Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Rishika ; Garg N; Mayall SS; Pathivada L; Yeluri R
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2018; 42(6):427-433. PubMed ID: 30085876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.