These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28508483)

  • 1. Genomic variance estimates: With or without disequilibrium covariances?
    Lehermeier C; de Los Campos G; Wimmer V; Schön CC
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):232-241. PubMed ID: 28508483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic best linear unbiased prediction method reflecting the degree of linkage disequilibrium.
    Nishio M; Satoh M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Oct; 132(5):357-65. PubMed ID: 25866073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contributions of linkage disequilibrium and co-segregation information to the accuracy of genomic prediction.
    Sun X; Fernando R; Dekkers J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Oct; 48(1):77. PubMed ID: 27729012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using selection index theory to estimate consistency of multi-locus linkage disequilibrium across populations.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Calus MP
    BMC Genet; 2015 Jul; 16():87. PubMed ID: 26187501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genome-Wide Association Studies with a Genomic Relationship Matrix: A Case Study with Wheat and Arabidopsis.
    Gianola D; Fariello MI; Naya H; Schön CC
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Oct; 6(10):3241-3256. PubMed ID: 27520956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genomic heritability: what is it?
    de Los Campos G; Sorensen D; Gianola D
    PLoS Genet; 2015 May; 11(5):e1005048. PubMed ID: 25942577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of identity-by-descent and identity-by-state matrices that are used for genetic evaluation and estimation of variance components.
    Fernando RL; Cheng H; Sun X; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Jun; 134(3):213-223. PubMed ID: 28508481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
    Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of heritability partitioning approaches in livestock populations.
    Yuan C; Gualdrón Duarte JL; Takeda H; Georges M; Druet T
    BMC Genomics; 2024 Jul; 25(1):690. PubMed ID: 39003468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expected influence of linkage disequilibrium on genetic variance caused by dominance and epistasis on quantitative traits.
    Hill WG; Mäki-Tanila A
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 25823842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linkage disequilibrium mapping of quantitative trait loci under truncation selection.
    Xiong M; Fan R; Jin L
    Hum Hered; 2002; 53(3):158-72. PubMed ID: 12145552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High-resolution joint linkage disequilibrium and linkage mapping of quantitative trait loci based on sibship data.
    Fan R; Jung J
    Hum Hered; 2003; 56(4):166-87. PubMed ID: 15031619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of shrinkage and variable selection methods for the prediction of complex human traits using data from distantly related individuals.
    Berger S; Pérez-Rodríguez P; Veturi Y; Simianer H; de los Campos G
    Ann Hum Genet; 2015 Mar; 79(2):122-35. PubMed ID: 25600682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linkage disequilibrium clustering-based approach for association mapping with tightly linked genomewide data.
    Li Z; Kemppainen P; Rastas P; Merilä J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Jul; 18(4):809-824. PubMed ID: 29673105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of linkage disequilibrium measures between multi-allelic markers as predictors of linkage disequilibrium between markers and QTL.
    Zhao H; Nettleton D; Soller M; Dekkers JC
    Genet Res; 2005 Aug; 86(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 16181525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Components of the accuracy of genomic prediction in a multi-breed sheep population.
    Daetwyler HD; Kemper KE; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3375-84. PubMed ID: 23038744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genomic scan as a tool for assessing the genetic component of phenotypic variance in wild populations.
    Herrera CM
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 888():315-29. PubMed ID: 22665289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Best Prediction of the Additive Genomic Variance in Random-Effects Models.
    Schreck N; Piepho HP; Schlather M
    Genetics; 2019 Oct; 213(2):379-394. PubMed ID: 31383770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.