232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28508765)
1. A Comparison of Outcomes of Treatment with Resection Prosthesis of the Hip in Revision and Oncological Surgery.
Kamiński P; Szmyd J; Ambroży J; Jaworski JM; Frańczuk B
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2017 Apr; 19(2):145-156. PubMed ID: 28508765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [The Role of a Modular Universal Tumour and Revision System (MUTARS®) in Lower Limb Endoprosthetic Revision Surgery - Outcome Analysis of 25 Patients].
Schmolders J; Koob S; Schepers P; Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Burger C; Pennekamp PH; Strauss AC
Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Feb; 155(1):61-66. PubMed ID: 27632667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment Outcomes and Quality of Life after the Implantation of Modular Prostheses of the Proximal Femur in Patients with Cancer Metastases.
Guzik G
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2016 May; 18(3):231-238. PubMed ID: 28157079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.
Benoist J; Lambotte JC; Polard JL; Huten D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):915-21. PubMed ID: 24211127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of a hydroxyapatite-coated sleeve and a porous-coated sleeve with a modular revision hip stem. A prospective, randomized study.
Bolognesi MP; Pietrobon R; Clifford PE; Vail TP
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Dec; 86(12):2720-5. PubMed ID: 15590859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Bone reconstruction, leg length discrepancy, and dislocation rate in 52 Wagner revision total hip arthroplasties at 44-month follow-up].
Boisgard S; Moreau PE; Tixier H; Levai JP
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Apr; 87(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 11319426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip arthroplasty in severe segmental femoral bone loss situations: use of a reconstruction modular stem design (JVC IX). Retrospective study of 23 cases.
Bertani A; Helix M; Louis ML; Rochwerger A; Curvale G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Nov; 95(7):491-7. PubMed ID: 19833568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Proximal femoral replacement in contemporary revision total hip arthroplasty for severe femoral bone loss: a review of outcomes.
Viste A; Perry KI; Taunton MJ; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
Bone Joint J; 2017 Mar; 99-B(3):325-329. PubMed ID: 28249971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are Females at Greater Risk for Revision Surgery After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty With the Articular Surface Replacement Prosthesis?
Donahue GS; Lindgren V; Galea VP; Madanat R; Muratoglu O; Malchau H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Oct; 474(10):2257-65. PubMed ID: 27121872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up.
Willems JH; Smulders K; Innocenti M; Bosker BH; van Hellemondt GG
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Nov; 37(11):2239-2246. PubMed ID: 35537612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femoral revision with a primary cementless stem.
Gastaud O; Cambas PM; Tabutin J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Apr; 102(2):149-53. PubMed ID: 26874449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Application of modular cementless femoral stems in complex revision hip arthroplasty].
Zhang ZD; Zhuo Q; Zhang QM; Song JL; Yang Fan ; Chen JY
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Mar; 28(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 25936185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].
Cech O; Stehlík J; Krbec M; Vrecion V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(3):148-61. PubMed ID: 11706537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Clinical results in early and mid term of using the S-ROM femoral stem in revision].
Piao S; Zhou YG; Du YQ; Ma HY; Sun JY; Gao ZS; Peng YW; Wu WM
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2017 Apr; 30(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 29349981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions.
Hoberg M; Konrads C; Engelien J; Oschmann D; Holder M; Walcher M; Steinert A; Rudert M
Int Orthop; 2016 Mar; 40(3):459-64. PubMed ID: 26130288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What Are the Long-term Results of MUTARS
Bus MP; van de Sande MA; Fiocco M; Schaap GR; Bramer JA; Dijkstra PD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):708-718. PubMed ID: 26649558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Total hip arthroplasty survival in femoral head avascular necrosis versus primary hip osteoarthritis: Case-control study with a mean 10-year follow-up after anatomical cementless metal-on-metal 28-mm replacement.
Ancelin D; Reina N; Cavaignac E; Delclaux S; Chiron P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Dec; 102(8):1029-1034. PubMed ID: 28341264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal femoral replacement using the direct anterior approach to the hip.
Thaler M; Manson TT; Holzapfel BM; Moskal J
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2022 Jun; 34(3):218-230. PubMed ID: 35641789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
