231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28508765)
21. Late complications and long-term outcomes following aseptic revision of a hip arthroplasty performed for oncological resection.
Houdek MT; Wagner ER; Wilke BK; Wyles CC; Taunton MJ; Sim FH
Hip Int; 2015; 25(5):428-34. PubMed ID: 26351114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.
Hoberg M; Konrads C; Engelien J; Oschmann D; Holder M; Walcher M; Rudert M
Int Orthop; 2015 Sep; 39(9):1709-13. PubMed ID: 25690924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Three-dimensional-printed hemi-pelvic prosthesis for revision of aseptic loosening or screw fracture of modular hemi-pelvic prosthesis].
Liu X; Luo Y; He X; Wang J; Li Z; Zhang Y; Hu X; Lu M; Tang F; Zhou Y; Min L; Tu C
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1183-1189. PubMed ID: 37848311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Are Complications Associated With the Repiphysis(®) Expandable Distal Femoral Prosthesis Acceptable for Its Continued Use?
Staals EL; Colangeli M; Ali N; Casanova JM; Donati DM; Manfrini M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):3003-13. PubMed ID: 25995179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component.
Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ
Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.
Davis CM; Berry DJ; Harmsen WS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Jul; 85(7):1264-9. PubMed ID: 12851351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Influence of the Type of Hip-Component Fixation and Age of Patients on Mid-Term Revision Rate of Total Hip Replacement].
Kubinec V
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 30257769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Femoral Component Revision Using a 2nd Generation Modular Femoral Implant.
Bhatia PK; Barnett SL; Lovell TP; Hozack WJ; Malkani AL
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Aug; 30(8):1397-402. PubMed ID: 25890503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Cementless femoral revision in patients with a previous cemented prosthesis.
Zeng M; Xie J; Li M; Lin S; Hu Y
Int Orthop; 2015 Aug; 39(8):1513-8. PubMed ID: 25693882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The Modular Universal Tumour And Revision System (MUTARS®) in endoprosthetic revision surgery.
Gebert C; Wessling M; Götze C; Gosheger G; Hardes J
Int Orthop; 2010 Dec; 34(8):1261-5. PubMed ID: 20379815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Clinical-radiological evaluation of the impaction allografting and cemented rod technique in revision knee surgery].
Mateo-Negreira J; López-Cuello P; Pipa-Muñiz I; Rodríguez García N; Murcia-Mazón A; Suárez-Suárez MA
Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol; 2016; 60(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 26655209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Long-term results of the ABG-1 hydroxyapatite coated total hip arthroplasty: analysis of 111 cases with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.
Bidar R; Kouyoumdjian P; Munini E; Asencio G
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Dec; 95(8):579-87. PubMed ID: 19926546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Surgical treatment of limb-length discrepancy following total hip arthroplasty.
Parvizi J; Sharkey PF; Bissett GA; Rothman RH; Hozack WJ
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2310-7. PubMed ID: 14668499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Two-Stage Revision for Periprosthetic Infection of the Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Comparison of Two Methods].
Včelák J; Macko M; Kubeš R; Němec K; Frydrychová M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2018; 85(3):179-185. PubMed ID: 30257776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modular endoprosthetic replacement for tumours of the proximal femur.
Chandrasekar CR; Grimer RJ; Carter SR; Tillman RM; Abudu A; Buckley L
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Jan; 91(1):108-12. PubMed ID: 19092014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Nonunion after periprosthetic femoral fracture associated with total hip arthroplasty.
Crockarell JR; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Aug; 81(8):1073-9. PubMed ID: 10466640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Revision hip arthroplasty management tactics--own experience].
Kaleta M; Gaździk TS; Wroński S; Gajda T; Bozek M
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2006; 71(6):431-8. PubMed ID: 17585486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty with femoral component revision.
Springer BD; Berry DJ; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Nov; 85(11):2156-62. PubMed ID: 14630846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
