These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28509504)

  • 1. Marginal Adaptation, Gap Width, and Fracture Strength of Teeth Restored With Different All-Ceramic Vs Metal Ceramic Crown Systems: An in Vitro Study.
    Monaco C; Rosentritt M; Llukacej A; Baldissara P; Scotti R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Sep; 24(3):130-137. PubMed ID: 28509504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the type of post and core on in vitro marginal continuity, fracture resistance, and fracture mode of lithia disilicate-based all-ceramic crowns.
    Forberger N; Göhring TN
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):264-73. PubMed ID: 18922255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of cementation on in vitro performance, marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of CAD/CAM-fabricated ZLS molar crowns.
    Preis V; Behr M; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Nov; 31(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 26345998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of incisal veneering porcelain thickness of two metal ceramic crown systems on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Geminiani A; Lee H; Feng C; Ercoli C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):275-82. PubMed ID: 20416410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of veneering porcelain thickness of all-ceramic and metal ceramic crowns on failure resistance after cyclic loading.
    Shirakura A; Lee H; Geminiani A; Ercoli C; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Feb; 101(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 19167536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of zirconia abutment preparation on the fracture strength of single implant lithium disilicate crowns after chewing simulation.
    Mitsias M; Koutayas SO; Wolfart S; Kern M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):675-82. PubMed ID: 23106096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs.
    Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
    Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture strength of 5 different all-ceramic crown systems.
    Strub JR; Beschnidt SM
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 10023224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An in vivo evaluation of fit of zirconium-oxide based ceramic single crowns, generated with two CAD/CAM systems, in comparison to metal ceramic single crowns.
    Biscaro L; Bonfiglioli R; Soattin M; Vigolo P
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jan; 22(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22946875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal and Internal Fit of Conventional Metal-Ceramic and Lithium Disilicate CAD/CAM Crowns.
    Nam SJ; Yoon MJ; Kim WH; Ryu GJ; Bang MK; Huh JB
    Int J Prosthodont; 2015; 28(5):519-21. PubMed ID: 26340013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of thermomechanical fatigue loading on the fracture resistance of all-ceramic posterior crowns.
    Senyilmaz DP; Canay S; Heydecke G; Strub JR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2010 Jun; 18(2):50-4. PubMed ID: 20698417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fracture mode during cyclic loading of implant-supported single-tooth restorations.
    Hosseini M; Kleven E; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Aug; 108(2):74-83. PubMed ID: 22867804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro study of fracture load and fracture pattern of ceramic crowns: a finite element and fractography analysis.
    Campos RE; Soares CJ; Quagliatto PS; Soares PV; de Oliveira OB; Santos-Filho PC; Salazar-Marocho SM
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Aug; 20(6):447-55. PubMed ID: 21843228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of core thickness differences on post-fatigue indentation fracture resistance of veneered zirconia crowns.
    Alhasanyah A; Vaidyanathan TK; Flinton RJ
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):383-90. PubMed ID: 23387466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Load-bearing capacity and the recommended thickness of dental monolithic zirconia single crowns.
    Sun T; Zhou S; Lai R; Liu R; Ma S; Zhou Z; Longquan S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Jul; 35():93-101. PubMed ID: 24762856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown.
    Ji MK; Park JH; Park SW; Yun KD; Oh GJ; Lim HP
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2015 Aug; 7(4):271-7. PubMed ID: 26330973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.