These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28509824)

  • 1. Implant Survival After Minimally Invasive Anterior or Anterolateral Vs. Conventional Posterior or Direct Lateral Approach: An Analysis of 21,860 Total Hip Arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013).
    Mjaaland KE; Svenningsen S; Fenstad AM; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Nordsletten L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):840-847. PubMed ID: 28509824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How Does Implant Survivorship Vary with Different Corail Femoral Stem Variants? Results of 51,212 Cases with Up to 30 Years Of Follow-up from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Melbye SM; Haug SCD; Fenstad AM; Furnes O; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Oct; 479(10):2169-2180. PubMed ID: 34427568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Early Rate of Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty Related to Surgical Approach: An Analysis of 122,345 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Lorimer M; Hatton A; de Steiger RN
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2020 Nov; 102(21):1874-1882. PubMed ID: 32769807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.
    Varnum C
    Dan Med J; 2017 Mar; 64(3):. PubMed ID: 28260601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do Stem Design and Surgical Approach Influence Early Aseptic Loosening in Cementless THA?
    Janssen L; Wijnands KAP; Janssen D; Janssen MWHE; Morrenhof JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jun; 476(6):1212-1220. PubMed ID: 29481346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Risk factors for revision surgery due to dislocation within 1 year after 111,711 primary total hip arthroplasties from 2005 to 2019: a study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Thoen PS; Lygre SHL; Nordsletten L; Furnes O; Stigum H; Hallan G; Röhrl SM
    Acta Orthop; 2022 Jun; 93():593-601. PubMed ID: 35770369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No Difference in Revision Rates or Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Between Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Femoral Neck Fracture: An Analysis of 5,025 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties From the New Zealand Joint Registry.
    Gupta VK; Hoskins WT; Frampton CMA; Vince KG
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Nov; 39(11):2767-2773. PubMed ID: 38710344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk.
    Sheth D; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Paxton EW; Namba RS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3401-8. PubMed ID: 25762014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The type of surgical approach influences the risk of revision in total hip arthroplasty: a study from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register of 90,662 total hipreplacements with 3 different cemented prostheses.
    Lindgren V; Garellick G; Kärrholm J; Wretenberg P
    Acta Orthop; 2012 Dec; 83(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 23116440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Revision total hip arthoplasty: factors associated with re-revision surgery.
    Khatod M; Cafri G; Inacio MC; Schepps AL; Paxton EW; Bini SA
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 97(5):359-66. PubMed ID: 25740025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Direct Anterior Approach: Risk Factor for Early Femoral Failure of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study.
    Meneghini RM; Elston AS; Chen AF; Kheir MM; Fehring TK; Springer BD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 Jan; 99(2):99-105. PubMed ID: 28099299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of cemented femoral fixation via anterior versus posterior approach total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 60,739 total hip arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Corfield S; Peng Y; Graves SE; Bingham R
    Hip Int; 2024 Jul; 34(4):442-451. PubMed ID: 38529902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association between fixation technique and revision risk in total hip arthroplasty patients younger than 55 years of age. Results from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association.
    Pedersen AB; Mehnert F; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Herberts P; Kärrholm J; Garellick G; Mäkela K; Eskelinen A; Overgaard S
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2014 May; 22(5):659-67. PubMed ID: 24631923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture.
    Rogmark C; Nåtman J; Jobory A; Hailer NP; Cnudde P
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):844-851. PubMed ID: 35775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Minimally invasive direct anterior approach for revision total hip arthroplasty].
    Kołodziej Ł; Bohatyrewicz A; Zietek P
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2008; 73(6):359-62. PubMed ID: 19241882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty dislocation rate following isolated cup revision using Hueter's direct anterior approach on a fracture table.
    Cogan A; Klouche S; Mamoudy P; Sariali E
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Sep; 97(5):501-5. PubMed ID: 21782540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The risk of revision due to dislocation after total hip arthroplasty depends on surgical approach, femoral head size, sex, and primary diagnosis. An analysis of 78,098 operations in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Hailer NP; Weiss RJ; Stark A; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2012 Oct; 83(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 23039167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reduced Revision Risk for Dual-Mobility Cup in Total Hip Replacement Due to Hip Fracture: A Matched-Pair Analysis of 9,040 Cases from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).
    Jobory A; Kärrholm J; Overgaard S; Becic Pedersen A; Hallan G; Gjertsen JE; Mäkelä K; Rogmark C
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Jul; 101(14):1278-1285. PubMed ID: 31318807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
    van Steenbergen LN; de Reus IM; Hannink G; Vehmeijer SB; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
    Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.