These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28510498)

  • 1. Deficits in go/no-go task performance in male undergraduate high-risk alcohol users are driven by speeded responding to go stimuli.
    Zhao X; Qian W; Fu L; Maes JHR
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2017 Nov; 43(6):656-663. PubMed ID: 28510498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male Smokers' and Non-Smokers' Response Inhibition in Go/No-Go Tasks: Effect of Three Task Parameters.
    Zhao X; Liu X; Zan X; Jin G; Maes JH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160595. PubMed ID: 27500831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response inhibition toward alcohol-related cues using an alcohol go/no-go task in problem and non-problem drinkers.
    Kreusch F; Vilenne A; Quertemont E
    Addict Behav; 2013 Oct; 38(10):2520-8. PubMed ID: 23773960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of correct and failed response inhibition in heavy versus light social drinkers: an fMRI study during a go/no-go task by healthy participants.
    Campanella S; Absil J; Carbia Sinde C; Schroder E; Peigneux P; Bourguignon M; Petieau M; Metens T; Nouali M; Goldman S; Cheron G; Verbanck P; De Tiège X
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2017 Dec; 11(6):1796-1811. PubMed ID: 27832450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of alcohol use on neural response to Go/No-Go task in college drinkers.
    Ahmadi A; Pearlson GD; Meda SA; Dager A; Potenza MN; Rosen R; Austad CS; Raskin SA; Fallahi CR; Tennen H; Wood RM; Stevens MC
    Neuropsychopharmacology; 2013 Oct; 38(11):2197-208. PubMed ID: 23670589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Alcohol abuse and ERP components in Go/No-go tasks using alcohol-related stimuli: impact of alcohol avoidance.
    Kreusch F; Quertemont E; Vilenne A; Hansenne M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 25110836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of stereotype threat and contextual cues on alcohol users' inhibitory control.
    Pennington CR; Qureshi A; Monk RL; Heim D
    Addict Behav; 2016 Mar; 54():12-7. PubMed ID: 26657819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of fetal alcohol syndrome on response execution and inhibition: an event-related potential study.
    Burden MJ; Andrew C; Saint-Amour D; Meintjes EM; Molteno CD; Hoyme HE; Robinson LK; Khaole N; Nelson CA; Jacobson JL; Jacobson SW
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2009 Nov; 33(11):1994-2004. PubMed ID: 19719791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Resisting temptation: decreasing alcohol-related affect and drinking behavior by training response inhibition.
    Houben K; Nederkoorn C; Wiers RW; Jansen A
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 Jul; 116(1-3):132-6. PubMed ID: 21288663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How actions taken (or not) under alcohol influence inhibitory control and perceived impairment.
    Marczinski CA
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2017 Jun; 25(3):166-174. PubMed ID: 28493741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alcohol consumption impairs stimulus- and error-related processing during a Go/No-Go Task.
    Easdon C; Izenberg A; Armilio ML; Yu H; Alain C
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Dec; 25(3):873-83. PubMed ID: 16256319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of a startle stimulus on response speed and inhibition in a go/no-go task.
    Washington JR; Blumenthal TD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jun; 52(6):745-53. PubMed ID: 25532594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Alcohol belongs here: Assessing alcohol-related inhibitory control with a contextual go/no-go task.
    Pennington CR; Monk RL; Qureshi AW; Heim D
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2019 Oct; 27(5):455-465. PubMed ID: 31120282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beer à no-go: learning to stop responding to alcohol cues reduces alcohol intake via reduced affective associations rather than increased response inhibition.
    Houben K; Havermans RC; Nederkoorn C; Jansen A
    Addiction; 2012 Jul; 107(7):1280-7. PubMed ID: 22296168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heavy drinking is associated with deficient response inhibition in women but not in men.
    Nederkoorn C; Baltus M; Guerrieri R; Wiers RW
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 2009 Sep; 93(3):331-6. PubMed ID: 19409923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Executive Impairments in Binge Drinking: Evidence for a Specific Performance-Monitoring Difficulty during Alcohol-Related Processing.
    Lannoy S; Maurage P; D'Hondt F; Billieux J; Dormal V
    Eur Addict Res; 2018; 24(3):118-127. PubMed ID: 29969784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurocognitive, psychological and behavioral correlates of binge drinking and use of alcohol with caffeinated beverages in college-aged adults.
    Watson TD; Sweeney JF; Louis H
    Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 2014 Jan; 40(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 24266584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alcohol-related context modulates performance of social drinkers in a visual Go/No-Go task: a preliminary assessment of event-related potentials.
    Petit G; Kornreich C; Noël X; Verbanck P; Campanella S
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e37466. PubMed ID: 22616012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of target probability on pre-stimulus brain activity.
    Lucci G; Berchicci M; Perri RL; Spinelli D; Di Russo F
    Neuroscience; 2016 May; 322():121-8. PubMed ID: 26912279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive predictors of problem drinking and AUDIT scores among college students.
    Murphy P; Garavan H
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2011 May; 115(1-2):94-100. PubMed ID: 21145183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.