These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

2413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28510760)

  • 1. What factors hinder the decision-making process for women with cancer and contemplating fertility preservation treatment?
    Jones G; Hughes J; Mahmoodi N; Smith E; Skull J; Ledger W
    Hum Reprod Update; 2017 Jul; 23(4):433-457. PubMed ID: 28510760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision-making in female fertility preservation is balancing the expected burden of fertility preservation treatment and the wish to conceive.
    Baysal Ö; Bastings L; Beerendonk CC; Postma SA; IntHout J; Verhaak CM; Braat DD; Nelen WL
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Jul; 30(7):1625-34. PubMed ID: 26034191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fertility preservation for transgender adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.
    Baram S; Myers SA; Yee S; Librach CL
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Nov; 25(6):694-716. PubMed ID: 31633751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preserving fertility in women with cancer (PreFer): Decision-making and patient-reported outcomes in women offered egg and embryo freezing prior to cancer treatment.
    Vogt KS; Hughes J; Wilkinson A; Mahmoodi N; Skull J; Wood H; McDougall S; Slade P; Greenfield DM; Pacey A; Ledger W; Jones GL
    Psychooncology; 2018 Dec; 27(12):2725-2732. PubMed ID: 30144212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.
    Anazodo A; Laws P; Logan S; Saunders C; Travaglia J; Gerstl B; Bradford N; Cohn R; Birdsall M; Barr R; Suzuki N; Takae S; Marinho R; Xiao S; Qiong-Hua C; Mahajan N; Patil M; Gunasheela D; Smith K; Sender L; Melo C; Almeida-Santos T; Salama M; Appiah L; Su I; Lane S; Woodruff TK; Pacey A; Anderson RA; Shenfield F; Ledger W; Sullivan E
    Hum Reprod Update; 2019 Mar; 25(2):159-179. PubMed ID: 30462263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children.
    Wyns C; Collienne C; Shenfield F; Robert A; Laurent P; Roegiers L; Brichard B
    Hum Reprod; 2015 Sep; 30(9):2022-30. PubMed ID: 26141713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priorities in Fertility Decisions for Reproductive-Aged Cancer Patients: Fertility Attitudes and Cancer Treatment Study.
    Flink DM; Kondapalli LA; Kellar-Guenther Y
    J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol; 2017 Sep; 6(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 28221816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients.
    Wang Y; Anazodo A; Logan S
    Psychooncology; 2019 Mar; 28(3):459-467. PubMed ID: 30523651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of factors affecting patient fertility preservation discussions & decision-making from the perspectives of patients and providers.
    Daly C; Micic S; Facey M; Speller B; Yee S; Kennedy ED; Corter AL; Baxter NN
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2019 Jan; 28(1):e12945. PubMed ID: 30375696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer: Oncology Nurses Report Attitudes and Barriers to Discussing Fertility Preservation.
    Nobel Murray A; Chrisler JC; Robbins ML
    Clin J Oncol Nurs; 2016 Aug; 20(4):E93-9. PubMed ID: 27441525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Busolo D; Woodgate R
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.
    Rittenmeyer L; Huffman D; Alagna M; Moore E
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Feb; 14(2):174-255. PubMed ID: 27536798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of delivering a fertility preservation service for women with cancer over a 12-year period at a UK assisted conception unit.
    McDougall S; Vogt KS; Wilkinson A; Skull J; Jones GL
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):252-259. PubMed ID: 31392913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.
    Truglio-Londrigan M; Slyer JT; Singleton JK; Worral P
    JBI Libr Syst Rev; 2012; 10(58):4633-4646. PubMed ID: 27820528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinician provision of oncofertility support in cancer patients of a reproductive age: A systematic review.
    Logan S; Perz J; Ussher J; Peate M; Anazodo A
    Psychooncology; 2018 Mar; 27(3):748-756. PubMed ID: 28762627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of oncofertility decision support resources among breast cancer patients and health care providers.
    Speller B; Sissons A; Daly C; Facey M; Kennedy E; Metcalfe K; Baxter NN
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2019 Feb; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 30728004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized controlled trial on the effect of an online decision aid for young female cancer patients regarding fertility preservation.
    Ehrbar V; Urech C; Rochlitz C; Zanetti Dällenbach R; Moffat R; Stiller R; Germeyer A; Nawroth F; Dangel A; Findeklee S; Tschudin S
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1726-1734. PubMed ID: 31398258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring patient and provider perspectives on the intersection between fertility, genetics, and family building.
    Lake PW; Kasting ML; Dean M; Fuzzell L; Hudson J; Carvajal R; Reed DR; Quinn GP; Vadaparampil ST
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Oct; 28(10):4833-4845. PubMed ID: 31982959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors associated with the receipt of fertility preservation services along the decision-making pathway in young Canadian female cancer patients.
    Yee S
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Feb; 33(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 26560157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 121.