These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28511620)

  • 21. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
    Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intelligibility of dysphonic speech in auralized classrooms.
    Bottalico P; Murgia S; Puglisi GE; Astolfi A; Ishikawa K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Oct; 150(4):2912. PubMed ID: 34717474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M; de Ronde-Brons I; Dreschler WA; Houben R
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individual differences in speech-in-noise perception parallel neural speech processing and attention in preschoolers.
    Thompson EC; Woodruff Carr K; White-Schwoch T; Otto-Meyer S; Kraus N
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():148-157. PubMed ID: 27864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Noise and a Speaker's Impaired Voice Quality on Spoken Language Processing in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Schiller IS; Remacle A; Durieux N; Morsomme D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 65(1):169-199. PubMed ID: 34902257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of competing noise on cortical auditory evoked potentials elicited by speech sounds in 7- to 25-year-old listeners.
    Gustafson SJ; Billings CJ; Hornsby BWY; Key AP
    Hear Res; 2019 Mar; 373():103-112. PubMed ID: 30660965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio on the pupillary response while performing a speech-in-noise test.
    Wendt D; Koelewijn T; Książek P; Kramer SE; Lunner T
    Hear Res; 2018 Nov; 369():67-78. PubMed ID: 29858121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and perceptual analyses of the voice of cochlear-implanted children.
    Guerrero Lopez HA; Mondain M; Amy de la Bretèque B; Serrafero P; Trottier C; Barkat-Defradas M
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):523.e1-17. PubMed ID: 23809572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
    Stilp CE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural indices of phonemic discrimination and sentence-level speech intelligibility in quiet and noise: A P3 study.
    Koerner TK; Zhang Y; Nelson PB; Wang B; Zou H
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():58-67. PubMed ID: 28441570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Children's perception of nonnative-accented sentences in noise and quiet.
    Bent T; Atagi E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3985-93. PubMed ID: 26723352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perception of Nonnative-accented Sentences by 5- to 8-Year-olds and Adults: The Role of Phonological Processing Skills.
    Bent T; Atagi E
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):110-122. PubMed ID: 28326989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparison of recordings of sentences and spontaneous speech: perceptual and acoustic measures in preschool children's voices.
    McAllister A; Brandt SK
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):673.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22717494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
    Wijayasiri P; Hartley DEH; Wiggins IM
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():55-67. PubMed ID: 28571617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Agreement between Transcription- and Rating-Based Intelligibility Measurements for Evaluation of Dysphonic Speech in Noise.
    Ishikawa K; Webster J; Ketring C
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2021 Oct; 35(10):983-995. PubMed ID: 33251880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sentence perception in listening conditions having similar speech intelligibility indices.
    Gustafson SJ; Pittman AL
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 21047291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Listening Comprehension and Listening Effort in the Primary School Classroom.
    Rudner M; Lyberg-Åhlander V; Brännström J; Nirme J; Pichora-Fuller MK; Sahlén B
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1193. PubMed ID: 30050489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
    Smiljanic R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contextual variability during speech-in-speech recognition.
    Brouwer S; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):EL26-32. PubMed ID: 24993234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.