These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28511696)

  • 1. Variant effect prediction tools assessed using independent, functional assay-based datasets: implications for discovery and diagnostics.
    Mahmood K; Jung CH; Philip G; Georgeson P; Chung J; Pope BJ; Park DJ
    Hum Genomics; 2017 May; 11(1):10. PubMed ID: 28511696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comprehensive Evaluation of the Performance of Prediction Algorithms on Clinically Relevant Missense Variants.
    Qorri E; Takács B; Gráf A; Enyedi MZ; Pintér L; Kiss E; Haracska L
    Int J Mol Sci; 2022 Jul; 23(14):. PubMed ID: 35887294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative Missense Variant Effect Prediction Using Large-Scale Mutagenesis Data.
    Gray VE; Hause RJ; Luebeck J; Shendure J; Fowler DM
    Cell Syst; 2018 Jan; 6(1):116-124.e3. PubMed ID: 29226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Representativeness of variation benchmark datasets.
    Schaafsma GCP; Vihinen M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(1):461. PubMed ID: 30497376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Updated benchmarking of variant effect predictors using deep mutational scanning.
    Livesey BJ; Marsh JA
    Mol Syst Biol; 2023 Aug; 19(8):e11474. PubMed ID: 37310135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A variant by any name: quantifying annotation discordance across tools and clinical databases.
    Yen JL; Garcia S; Montana A; Harris J; Chervitz S; Morra M; West J; Chen R; Church DM
    Genome Med; 2017 Jan; 9(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Family-Based Benchmarking of Copy Number Variation Detection Software.
    Nutsua ME; Fischer A; Nebel A; Hofmann S; Schreiber S; Krawczak M; Nothnagel M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133465. PubMed ID: 26197066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically relevant variant datasets.
    Gunning AC; Fryer V; Fasham J; Crosby AH; Ellard S; Baple EL; Wright CF
    J Med Genet; 2021 Aug; 58(8):547-555. PubMed ID: 32843488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. COGNIZER: A Framework for Functional Annotation of Metagenomic Datasets.
    Bose T; Haque MM; Reddy C; Mande SS
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142102. PubMed ID: 26561344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive benchmark of RNA-RNA interaction prediction tools for all domains of life.
    Umu SU; Gardner PP
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(7):988-996. PubMed ID: 27993777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Correspondence between functional scores from deep mutational scans and predicted effects on protein stability.
    Gerasimavicius L; Livesey BJ; Marsh JA
    Protein Sci; 2023 Jul; 32(7):e4688. PubMed ID: 37243972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer.
    Walsh T; Casadei S; Coats KH; Swisher E; Stray SM; Higgins J; Roach KC; Mandell J; Lee MK; Ciernikova S; Foretova L; Soucek P; King MC
    JAMA; 2006 Mar; 295(12):1379-88. PubMed ID: 16551709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Simulating Next-Generation Sequencing Datasets from Empirical Mutation and Sequencing Models.
    Stephens ZD; Hudson ME; Mainzer LS; Taschuk M; Weber MR; Iyer RK
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0167047. PubMed ID: 27893777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genetic variant pathogenicity prediction trained using disease-specific clinical sequencing data sets.
    Evans P; Wu C; Lindy A; McKnight DA; Lebo M; Sarmady M; Abou Tayoun AN
    Genome Res; 2019 Jul; 29(7):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 31235655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. VariBench: a benchmark database for variations.
    Sasidharan Nair P; Vihinen M
    Hum Mutat; 2013 Jan; 34(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 22903802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variation benchmark datasets: update, criteria, quality and applications.
    Sarkar A; Yang Y; Vihinen M
    Database (Oxford); 2020 Jan; 2020():. PubMed ID: 32016318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the accuracy of BRCA1/2 mutation prediction: validation of the novel country-customized IC software.
    Capalbo C; Ricevuto E; Vestri A; Sidoni T; Buffone A; Cortesi E; Marchetti P; Scambia G; Tomao S; Rinaldi C; Zani M; Ferraro S; Frati L; Screpanti I; Gulino A; Giannini G
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2006 Jan; 14(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 16288312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting protein variant effects with computational predictors and deep mutational scanning.
    Livesey BJ; Marsh JA
    Dis Model Mech; 2022 Jun; 15(6):. PubMed ID: 35736673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. RBscore&NBench: a high-level web server for nucleic acid binding residues prediction with a large-scale benchmarking database.
    Miao Z; Westhof E
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jul; 44(W1):W562-7. PubMed ID: 27084939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A computationally efficient algorithm for genomic prediction using a Bayesian model.
    Wang T; Chen YP; Goddard ME; Meuwissen TH; Kemper KE; Hayes BJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):34. PubMed ID: 25926276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.