BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512036)

  • 1. Vocal responses of austral forest frogs to amplitude and degradation patterns of advertisement calls.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN; Muñoz MI; Cisternas J
    Behav Processes; 2017 Jul; 140():190-201. PubMed ID: 28512036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extended amplification of acoustic signals by amphibian burrows.
    Muñoz MI; Penna M
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Jul; 202(7):473-87. PubMed ID: 27209276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrasting Propagation of Natural Calls of Two Anuran Species from the South American Temperate Forest.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134498. PubMed ID: 26230852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Amplification and spectral shifts of vocalizations inside burrows of the frog Eupsophus calcaratus (Leptodactylidae).
    Penna M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1254-60. PubMed ID: 15376690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ample active acoustic space of a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2014 Mar; 200(3):171-81. PubMed ID: 24356786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Severe constraints for sound communication in a frog from the South American temperate forest.
    Penna M; Plaza A; Moreno-Gómez FN
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Aug; 199(8):723-33. PubMed ID: 23748250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Lombard effect in male ultrasonic frogs: Regulating antiphonal signal frequency and amplitude in noise.
    Shen JX; Xu ZM
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():27103. PubMed ID: 27345957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Responses of male cricket frogs (
    Venator KR; Ryan MJ; Wilczynski W
    Ethology; 2017 May; 123(5):357-364. PubMed ID: 28966421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vocal communication in frogs.
    Kelley DB
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2004 Dec; 14(6):751-7. PubMed ID: 15582379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The biological significance of acoustic stimuli determines ear preference in the music frog.
    Xue F; Fang G; Yang P; Zhao E; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    J Exp Biol; 2015 Mar; 218(Pt 5):740-7. PubMed ID: 25740903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of call frequency and the auditory papillae in phonotactic behavior in male Dart-poison frogs Epipedobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae).
    Hödl W; Amézquita A; Narins PM
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2004 Oct; 190(10):823-9. PubMed ID: 15278399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pure ultrasonic communication in an endemic Bornean frog.
    Arch VS; Grafe TU; Gridi-Papp M; Narins PM
    PLoS One; 2009; 4(4):e5413. PubMed ID: 19401782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The vocal sac increases call rate in the Tungara frog Physalaemus pustulosus.
    Pauly GB; Bernal XE; Rand AS; Ryan MJ
    Physiol Biochem Zool; 2006; 79(4):708-19. PubMed ID: 16826497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sound transmission and the recognition of temporally degraded sexual advertisement signals in Cope's gray treefrog (Hyla chrysoscelis).
    Kuczynski MC; Vélez A; Schwartz JJ; Bee MA
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Aug; 213(Pt 16):2840-50. PubMed ID: 20675554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of complex sounds by the green treefrog, Hyla cinerea: envelope and fine-structure cues.
    Simmons AM; Buxbaum RC; Mirin MP
    J Comp Physiol A; 1993 Sep; 173(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 8229896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advertisement-call preferences in diploid-tetraploid treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis and Hyla versicolor): implications for mate choice and the evolution of communication systems.
    Gerhardt HC
    Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):395-408. PubMed ID: 15807424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Male vocal competition is dynamic and strongly affected by social contexts in music frogs.
    Fang G; Jiang F; Yang P; Cui J; Brauth SE; Tang Y
    Anim Cogn; 2014 Mar; 17(2):483-94. PubMed ID: 24030652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of acoustic cue modifications on evoked vocal response to calls in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Vignal C; Mathevon N
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 May; 125(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 21341908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Old world frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics.
    Narins PM; Feng AS; Lin W; Schnitzler HU; Denzinger A; Suthers RA; Xu C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Feb; 115(2):910-3. PubMed ID: 15000202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acoustic interference and recognition space within a complex assemblage of dendrobatid frogs.
    Amézquita A; Flechas SV; Lima AP; Gasser H; Hödl W
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Oct; 108(41):17058-63. PubMed ID: 21969562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.