BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

466 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512069)

  • 1. Optical coherence tomography findings: insights from the "randomised multicentre trial investigating angiographic outcomes of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer compared with everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in chronic total occlusions" (PRISON IV) trial.
    Teeuwen K; Spoormans EM; Bennett J; Dubois C; Desmet W; Ughi GJ; Belmans A; Kelder JC; Tijssen JGP; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ; Adriaenssens T
    EuroIntervention; 2017 Aug; 13(5):e522-e530. PubMed ID: 28512069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomized Multicenter Trial Investigating Angiographic Outcomes of Hybrid Sirolimus-Eluting Stents With Biodegradable Polymer Compared With Everolimus-Eluting Stents With Durable Polymer in Chronic Total Occlusions: The PRISON IV Trial.
    Teeuwen K; van der Schaaf RJ; Adriaenssens T; Koolen JJ; Smits PC; Henriques JP; Vermeersch PH; Tjon Joe Gin RM; Schölzel BE; Kelder JC; Tijssen JG; Agostoni P; Suttorp MJ
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jan; 10(2):133-143. PubMed ID: 28104206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Randomised comparison of vascular response to biodegradable polymer sirolimus eluting and permanent polymer everolimus eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study.
    Koppara T; Tada T; Xhepa E; Kufner S; Byrne RA; Ibrahim T; Laugwitz KL; Kastrati A; Joner M
    Int J Cardiol; 2018 May; 258():42-49. PubMed ID: 29544956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of long-term in-stent vascular response between abluminal groove-filled biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent and durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: 3-year OCT follow-up from the TARGET I trial.
    Xu B; Zhang YJ; Sun ZW; Qiao SB; Chen SL; Zhang RY; Pan DR; Pang S; Zhang Q; Xu L; Yang YJ; Leon MB; Gao RL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1489-96. PubMed ID: 26208685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography.
    Tada T; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; Kitabata H; Tiroch K; Dirninger A; Gratze F; Kaspar K; Zenker G; Joner M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23352095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of a novel biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent with a durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent: results of the randomized BIOFLOW-II trial.
    Windecker S; Haude M; Neumann FJ; Stangl K; Witzenbichler B; Slagboom T; Sabaté M; Goicolea J; Barragan P; Cook S; Piot C; Richardt G; Merkely B; Schneider H; Bilger J; Erne P; Waksman R; Zaugg S; Jüni P; Lefèvre T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Feb; 8(2):e001441. PubMed ID: 25634905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. First-in-man randomised comparison of the Angiolite durable fluoroacrylate polymer-based sirolimus-eluting stent versus a durable fluoropolymer-based everolimus-eluting stent in patients with coronary artery disease: the ANGIOLITE trial.
    Moreu J; Moreno-Gómez R; Pérez de Prado A; García Del Blanco B; Trillo R; Pinar E; Molina E; Zueco J; Merchán A; Díaz-Fernández JF; Amat I
    EuroIntervention; 2019 Dec; 15(12):e1081-e1089. PubMed ID: 31310239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of late strut coverage patterns between first-generation drug-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting stent.
    Toledano Delgado FJ; Alvarez-Ossorio MP; de Lezo Cruz-Conde JS; Bellido FM; Romero Moreno MÁ; Fernández-Aceytuno AM; de Lezo Herrerosde Tejada JS; Pineda SO; Saint-Gerons JM; Pavlovic D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Nov; 84(5):720-6. PubMed ID: 24174291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of neointimal coverage between everolimus-eluting stents and sirolimus-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomography substudy of the RESET (Randomized Evaluation of Sirolimus-eluting versus Everolimus-eluting stent Trial).
    Kubo T; Akasaka T; Kozuma K; Kimura K; Kawamura M; Sumiyoshi T; Ino Y; Morino Y; Tanabe K; Kadota K; Kimura T;
    EuroIntervention; 2015 Sep; 11(5):564-71. PubMed ID: 26390517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-year vascular responses to drug-eluting stents with biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer: An optical coherence tomography sub-study of the NEXT.
    Katayama Y; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Ino Y; Kimura K; Okura H; Shinke T; Igarashi K; Kadota K; Kozuma K; Tanabe K; Nakagawa Y; Muramatsu T; Morino Y; Kimura T;
    J Cardiol; 2017 Dec; 70(6):530-536. PubMed ID: 28536015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
    Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of neointimal coverage and extra-stent lumen between sirolimus and everolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
    Oda T; Okamura T; Yamada J; Miyagi N; Uehara H; Nao T; Tateishi H; Maeda T; Nakamura T; Shiraishi K; Nakashima T; Nishimura S; Miura T; Matsuzaki M; Yano M
    Heart Vessels; 2016 Apr; 31(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 25614415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparable vascular response of a new generation sirolimus eluting stents when compared to fluoropolymer everolimus eluting stents in the porcine coronary restenosis model.
    Buszman PP; Michalak MJ; Pruski M; Fernandez C; Jelonek M; Janas A; Savard C; Gwiazdowska-Nowotka B; Żurakowski A; Wojakowski W; Buszman PE; Milewski K
    Cardiol J; 2016; 23(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 27976797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of neointimal coverage between ultrathin biodegradable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stents and durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents: 6 months optical coherence tomography follow-up from the TAXCO study.
    Abhyankar A; Abizaid A; Chamié D; Rathod M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Feb; 97(3):423-430. PubMed ID: 32243050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Early Vascular Healing Following Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Placement Compared to That with Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent.
    Ogura K; Tsujita H; Oishi Y; Matsumoto H; Matsukawa N; Sakai R; Arai T; Sato S; Tanaka H; Masaki R; Arai K; Nomura K; Kosaki R; Sakai K; Sekimoto T; Kondo S; Tsukamoto S; Mori H; Yamamoto MH; Wakabayashi K; Suzuki H; Ochiai M; Shinke T
    Int Heart J; 2021 May; 62(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 33994509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. First-in-human evaluation of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: imaging and clinical results of the DESSOLVE I Trial (DES with sirolimus and a bioabsorbable polymer for the treatment of patients with de novo lesion in the native coronary arteries).
    Ormiston J; Webster M; Stewart J; Vrolix M; Whitbourn R; Donohoe D; Knape C; Lansky A; Attizzani GF; Fitzgerald P; Kandzari DE; Wijns W
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1026-34. PubMed ID: 24055443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Favorable neointimal coverage in everolimus-eluting stent at 9 months after stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
    Choi HH; Kim JS; Yoon DH; Hong KS; Kim TH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 21442265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optical coherence tomography study of healing characteristics of paclitaxel-eluting balloons vs. everolimus-eluting stents for in-stent restenosis: the SEDUCE (Safety and Efficacy of a Drug elUting balloon in Coronary artery rEstenosis) randomised clinical trial.
    Adriaenssens T; Dens J; Ughi G; Bennett J; Dubois C; Sinnaeve P; Wiyono S; Coosemans M; Belmans A; D'hooge J; Vrolix M; Desmet W
    EuroIntervention; 2014 Aug; 10(4):439-48. PubMed ID: 25138182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized multicenter comparison of hybrid sirolimus-eluting stents with bioresorbable polymer versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in total coronary occlusion: rationale and design of the Primary Stenting of Occluded Native Coronary Arteries IV study.
    Teeuwen K; Adriaenssens T; Van den Branden BJ; Henriques JP; Van der Schaaf RJ; Koolen JJ; Vermeersch PH; Bosschaert MA; Tijssen JG; Suttorp MJ
    Trials; 2012 Dec; 13():240. PubMed ID: 23241457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.