These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512273)

  • 1. Comparison of Complications in Removable Mandibular Acrylic Splint and Cantilever Herbst for Management of Class II Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study.
    Kanuru RK; Bhasin V; Khatri A; Dodda KK; Singh E; Grover S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 May; 18(5):363-365. PubMed ID: 28512273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retrospective study of clinical complications during orthodontic treatment with either a removable mandibular acrylic splint Herbst or with a cantilever Herbst.
    Silva JF; Gerszewski C; Moresca RC; Correr GM; Flores-Mir C; Moro A
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 24849335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acrylic splint Herbst and Hanks telescoping Herbst: a retrospective study of emergencies, retreatments, treatment times and failures.
    Manni A; Cozzani M; Mazzotta L; Fiore VP; Mutinelli S
    Int Orthod; 2014 Mar; 12(1):100-10. PubMed ID: 24485200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of complications in the conventional telescopic Herbst rod and tube and Manni telescopic Herbst: A retrospective clinical study.
    Manni A; Mutinelli S; Cerruto C; Giraudo P; Romano R; Cozzani M
    Angle Orthod; 2018 Jul; 88(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 29517275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Aug; 94(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 3041796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.
    McNamara JA; Howe RP; Dischinger TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1990 Aug; 98(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 2378319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical complications during treatment with a modified Herbst appliance in combination with a lingual appliance.
    Wiechmann D; Vu J; Schwestka-Polly R; Helms HJ; Knösel M
    Head Face Med; 2015 Sep; 11():31. PubMed ID: 26353793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
    Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dentaoalveolar changes in young adult patients with class II/1 malocclusion treated with the herbst appliance and an activator].
    Nedeljković N; Sćepan I; Glisić B; Marković E
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2010 Feb; 67(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 20337101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances.
    Hourfar J; Lisson JA; Kinzinger GSM
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1525-1534. PubMed ID: 33409688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12923506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review with meta-analysis.
    Al-Dboush R; Soltan R; Rao J; El-Bialy T
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2022 Feb; 25(1):31-48. PubMed ID: 34145968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Herbst appliance updated.
    Schiavoni R
    Prog Orthod; 2011 Nov; 12(2):149-60. PubMed ID: 22074840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A retrospective cephalometric investigation of two fixed functional orthodontic appliances in class II treatment: Functional Mandibular Advancer vs. Herbst appliance.
    Kinzinger GSM; Lisson JA; Frye L; Gross U; Hourfar J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Jan; 22(1):293-304. PubMed ID: 28365810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of external apical root resorption caused by fixed functional treatment of class II malocclusion : Cast splint Herbst appliance vs. Forsus fatigue resistant device.
    Çoban G; Gül Amuk N; Yağcı A; Akgün G; Abbood Abbood IH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jan; 84(1):50-59. PubMed ID: 34331069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Herbst appliance with skeletal anchorage versus dental anchorage in adolescents with Class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Batista KBDSL; Lima T; Palomares N; Carvalho FA; Quintão C; Miguel JAM; Lin YL; Su TL; O'Brien K
    Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):564. PubMed ID: 29178932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentoskeletal effects of Twin Block and Herbst appliances in patients with Class II division 1 mandibular retrognathy.
    Baysal A; Uysal T
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Apr; 36(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24663007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Management of the Herbst splint appliance in Class II malocclusion with different growth pattern.
    Schiavoni R; Grenga V
    Prog Orthod; 2009; 10(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 19506745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.