These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512296)
1. Entanglement monogamy in three qutrit systems. Li Q; Cui J; Wang S; Long GL Sci Rep; 2017 May; 7(1):1946. PubMed ID: 28512296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. General monogamy relation for the entanglement of formation in multiqubit systems. Bai YK; Xu YF; Wang ZD Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Sep; 113(10):100503. PubMed ID: 25238341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tighter Constraints of Multi-Qubit Entanglement in Terms of Nonconvex Entanglement Measures LCREN and LCRENoA. Shen Z; Xuan D; Zhou W; Wang Z; Fei SM Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jan; 26(2):. PubMed ID: 38392382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Monogamy relation of multi-qubit systems for squared Tsallis-q entanglement. Yuan GM; Song W; Yang M; Li DC; Zhao JL; Cao ZL Sci Rep; 2016 Jun; 6():28719. PubMed ID: 27346605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Unified Monogamy Relations of Multipartite Entanglement. Khan A; Ur Rehman J; Wang K; Shin H Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16419. PubMed ID: 31712571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Linear entropy of multiqutrit nonorthogonal states. Maleki Y; Zheltikov AM Opt Express; 2019 Mar; 27(6):8291-8307. PubMed ID: 31052650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Strong monogamy of bipartite and genuine multipartite entanglement: the Gaussian case. Adesso G; Illuminati F Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(15):150501. PubMed ID: 17995148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linear monogamy of entanglement in three-qubit systems. Liu F; Gao F; Wen QY Sci Rep; 2015 Nov; 5():16745. PubMed ID: 26568265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Geometry and Entanglement of Two-Qubit States in the Quantum Probabilistic Representation. López-Saldívar JA; Castaños O; Nahmad-Achar E; López-Peña R; Man'ko MA; Man'ko VI Entropy (Basel); 2018 Aug; 20(9):. PubMed ID: 33265719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Should Entanglement Measures be Monogamous or Faithful? Lancien C; Di Martino S; Huber M; Piani M; Adesso G; Winter A Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Aug; 117(6):060501. PubMed ID: 27541447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundamental monogamy relation between contextuality and nonlocality. Kurzyński P; Cabello A; Kaszlikowski D Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Mar; 112(10):100401. PubMed ID: 24679270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Numerical and analytical results for geometric measure of coherence and geometric measure of entanglement. Zhang Z; Dai Y; Dong YL; Zhang C Sci Rep; 2020 Jul; 10(1):12122. PubMed ID: 32694576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multipartite entanglement indicators based on monogamy relations of n-qubit symmetric states. Liu F; Gao F; Qin SJ; Xie SC; Wen QY Sci Rep; 2016 Feb; 6():20302. PubMed ID: 26842264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are general quantum correlations monogamous? Streltsov A; Adesso G; Piani M; Bruss D Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Aug; 109(5):050503. PubMed ID: 23006154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring qutrit-qutrit entanglement of orbital angular momentum states of an atomic ensemble and a photon. Inoue R; Yonehara T; Miyamoto Y; Koashi M; Kozuma M Phys Rev Lett; 2009 Sep; 103(11):110503. PubMed ID: 19792358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]