These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512521)

  • 1. Using Pre-Assessment and In-Class Questions to Change Student Understanding of Molecular Movements.
    Shi J; Knight JK; Chun H; Guild NA; Martin JM
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2017 Apr; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 28512521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cues Matter: Learning Assistants Influence Introductory Biology Student Interactions during Clicker-Question Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Rentsch J; Furtak EM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2015; 14(4):ar41. PubMed ID: 26590204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Group Random Call Can Positively Affect Student In-Class Clicker Discussions.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Sieke S
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2016; 15(4):. PubMed ID: 27856544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding clicker discussions: student reasoning and the impact of instructional cues.
    Knight JK; Wise SB; Southard KM
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(4):645-54. PubMed ID: 24297291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Higher-Order Clicker Questions Engage Students and Prepare Them for Higher-Order Thinking Activities.
    Anderson DK; Schoenleber M; Korshavn S
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2023 Apr; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 37089235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions.
    Kirkwood-Watts DL; Bremers EK; Robinson EA; Brazeal KR; Couch BA
    J Microbiol Biol Educ; 2022 Aug; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 36061330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Promoting student-centered active learning in lectures with a personal response system.
    Gauci SA; Dantas AM; Williams DA; Kemm RE
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2009 Mar; 33(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 19261762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Undergraduate students' neurophysiological reasoning: what we learn from the attractive distractors students select.
    Doherty JH; Cerchiara JA; Wenderoth MP
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2023 Jun; 47(2):222-236. PubMed ID: 36759149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Promoting an active form of learning out-of-class via answering online "study questions" leads to higher than expected exam scores in General Biology.
    Gibson SI
    PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1322. PubMed ID: 26500828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing student retention of prerequisite knowledge through pre-class activities and in-class reinforcement.
    Taylor AT; Olofson EL; Novak WR
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2017 Mar; 45(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 27537100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medical student misconceptions in cardiovascular physiology.
    Bordes SJ; Manyevitch R; Huntley JD; Li Y; Murray IVJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2021 Jun; 45(2):241-249. PubMed ID: 33825522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using lectures to identify student misconceptions: a study on the paradoxical effects of hyperkalemia on vascular smooth muscle.
    Bordes SJ; Gandhi J; Bauer B; Protas M; Solomon N; Bogdan L; Brummund D; Bass B; Clunes M; Murray IVJ
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2020 Mar; 44(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 31821033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acceptance of clickers in a large multimodal biochemistry class as determined by student evaluations of teaching: Are they just an annoying distraction for distance students?
    Miles NG; Soares da Costa TP
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2016; 44(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 26515808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Students' Use of Optional Online Reviews and Its Relationship to Summative Assessment Outcomes in Introductory Biology.
    Carpenter SK; Rahman S; Lund TJ; Armstrong PI; Lamm MH; Reason RD; Coffman CR
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2017; 16(2):. PubMed ID: 28408408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses.
    Preszler RW; Dawe A; Shuster CB; Shuster M
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2007; 6(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 17339392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying student misconceptions in biomedical course assessments in dental education.
    Curtis DA; Lind SL; Dellinges M; Schroeder K
    J Dent Educ; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1183-94. PubMed ID: 22942414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uncovering students' misconceptions by assessment of their written questions.
    Olde Bekkink M; Donders AR; Kooloos JG; de Waal RM; Ruiter DJ
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Aug; 16(1):221. PubMed ID: 27558400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum.
    FitzPatrick KA; Finn KE; Campisi J
    Adv Physiol Educ; 2011 Sep; 35(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 21908838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Teaching meiosis with the DNA triangle framework: A classroom activity that changes how students think about chromosomes.
    Wright LK; Cortez P; Franzen MA; Newman DL
    Biochem Mol Biol Educ; 2022 Jan; 50(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 34626453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying misconceptions about oral radiology and medicine among dental students.
    Bezerra HKF; Passos KKM; Leonel ACLDS; Carvalho EJA; Nascimento EHLD; Ramos-Perez FMM; Perez DEDC
    J Dent Educ; 2022 Feb; 86(2):144-153. PubMed ID: 34542910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.