77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28512801)
1. Poster - Thurs Eve-15: Comparison of Cobalt-60 and 6 MV linac based tomotherapy: A prostate case study.
Dhanesar SK; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr AT; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3404. PubMed ID: 28512801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical and clinical considerations in Cobalt-60 tomotherapy.
Joshi CP; Dhanesar S; Darko J; Kerr A; Vidyasagar PB; Schreiner LJ
J Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 34(3):137-40. PubMed ID: 20098560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cobalt-60 tomotherapy: clinical treatment planning and phantom dose delivery studies.
Dhanesar S; Darko J; Joshi CP; Kerr A; Schreiner LJ
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081710. PubMed ID: 23927307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative analysis of 60Co intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Fox C; Romeijn HE; Lynch B; Men C; Aleman DM; Dempsey JF
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jun; 53(12):3175-88. PubMed ID: 18506074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poster - Thurs Eve-07: The dosimetric consequences of MLC position inaccuracy in IMRT.
Rangel A; Dunscombe P
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3402-3403. PubMed ID: 28512816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric advantage and clinical implication of a micro-multileaf collimator in the treatment of prostate with intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Wang L; Hoban P; Paskalev K; Yang J; Li J; Chen L; Xiong W; Ma CC
Med Dosim; 2005; 30(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 15922176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of beam number on organ-at-risk sparing in dynamic multileaf collimator delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Popple RA; Fiveash JB; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3752-9. PubMed ID: 17985620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays.
Hayashi A; Shibamoto Y; Hattori Y; Tamura T; Iwabuchi M; Otsuka S; Sugie C; Yanagi T
J Radiat Res; 2015 Mar; 56(2):338-45. PubMed ID: 25609741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Investigation of an efficient source design for Cobalt-60-based tomotherapy using EGSnrc Monte Carlo simulations.
Joshi CP; Darko J; Vidyasagar PB; Schreiner LJ
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(3):575-92. PubMed ID: 18199903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery.
Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3491-500. PubMed ID: 18777909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT radiation modalities in treating brain and cranio-spinal tumors.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Delichas MG; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Feb; 8(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19166237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poster - Thur Eve - 72: Conversion of helical tomotherapy plans into clinically favourable step-and-shoot IMRT plans deliverable on a c-arm linac.
Studinski R; Alexander A; La Russa D
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part4):4638. PubMed ID: 28516637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The comparison of radiotherapy techniques for treatment of the prostate cancer: the three-field vs. the four-field.
Milecki P; Piotrowski T; Dymnicka M
Neoplasma; 2004; 51(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 15004663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Poster - Thurs Eve-01: Comparison of clinical IMRT plan quality and delivery accuracy: Few large segments vs many small segments.
Sawchuk S; Karnas S; McCune K; Mulligan M; Dar R; Chen J
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3401. PubMed ID: 28512831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Position-probability-sampled Monte Carlo calculation of VMAT, 3DCRT, step-shoot IMRT, and helical tomotherapy dose distributions using BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc.
Belec J; Ploquin N; La Russa DJ; Clark BG
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):948-60. PubMed ID: 21452731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
