These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 285130)

  • 21. [Panoramic radiography using an intraoral tube. Method, anatomy, radiography and dosimetry].
    Bianchi SD; Bonifacino M; Serrallonga M
    Minerva Stomatol; 1998 Apr; 47(4):169-81. PubMed ID: 9617129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Absorbed doses with intraoral radiography. Function of various technical parameters.
    Hayakawa Y; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Oct; 76(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 8233434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reducing the risk of intraoral radiographic imaging with collimation and thyroid shielding.
    Johnson KB; Ludlow JB; Mauriello SM; Platin E
    Gen Dent; 2014; 62(4):34-40. PubMed ID: 24983168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Phantom measurements of absorbed doses in dental radiography.
    Wohni T
    Acta Radiol Ther Phys Biol; 1977 Apr; 16(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 868582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Doses to patients from pantomographic and conventional dental radiography.
    Wall BF; Fisher ES; Paynter R; Hudson A; Bird PD
    Br J Radiol; 1979 Sep; 52(621):727-34. PubMed ID: 476387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view.
    Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Must radiation dose for CT of the maxilla and mandible be higher than that for conventional panoramic radiography?
    Diederichs CG; Engelke WG; Richter B; Hermann KP; Oestmann JW
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 1996 Oct; 17(9):1758-60. PubMed ID: 8896633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Red bone marrow doses, integral absorbed doses, and somatically effective dose equivalent from four maxillary occlusal projections.
    Berge TI; Wøhni T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Feb; 57(2):212-8. PubMed ID: 6583630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiation absorbed from dental implant radiography: a comparison of linear tomography, CT scan, and panoramic and intra-oral techniques.
    Clark DE; Danforth RA; Barnes RW; Burtch ML
    J Oral Implantol; 1990; 16(3):156-64. PubMed ID: 2098559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dosimetry of absorbed radiation in radiographic cephalometry.
    Gilda JE; Maillie HD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):638-43. PubMed ID: 1518655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex.
    Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 8593910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dose reduction in maxillofacial imaging using low dose Cone Beam CT.
    Tsiklakis K; Donta C; Gavala S; Karayianni K; Kamenopoulou V; Hourdakis CJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2005 Dec; 56(3):413-7. PubMed ID: 15978765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device.
    Mah JK; Danforth RA; Bumann A; Hatcher D
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):508-13. PubMed ID: 14561979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Order of magnitude dose reduction in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Angin LL; Lorton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1987 Mar; 114(3):344-7. PubMed ID: 3470357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Dosimetry of digital panoramic imaging. Part I: Patient exposure.
    Gijbels F; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Debaveye D; Verlinden S; Sanderink G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):145-9. PubMed ID: 15897284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Total energy absorbed by patient under radiographic irradiation (integral dose), with special reference to dental radiography].
    Nakamura T
    Shiyo; 1983 Nov; 31(11):25-9. PubMed ID: 6593518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Radiologic exposure of the dental patient: comparison of the doses delivered by different techniques].
    Jones P; Reychler H; Engels H; Wambersie A
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 18506961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols.
    Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G
    Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparative means of dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Rohlin M; White SC
    Curr Opin Dent; 1992 Jun; 2():1-9. PubMed ID: 1520917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Review article: radiation protection in dental radiology.
    Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Nov; 67(803):1041-9. PubMed ID: 7820393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.