These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 285130)

  • 41. Radiation doses of collimated vs non-collimated cephalometric exposures.
    Gijbels F; Sanderink G; Wyatt J; Van Dam J; Nowak B; Jacobs R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Mar; 32(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 12775668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A leaded apron for use in panoramic dental radiography.
    Whitcher BL; Gratt BM; Sickles EA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 May; 49(5):467-70. PubMed ID: 6929470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Dose reduction to the thyroid gland in intraoral source radiography.
    Hayakawa Y; Sakoh T; Fujimori H; Kuroyanagi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 8508936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Radiation-absorbed doses and energy imparted from panoramic tomography, cephalometric radiography, and occlusal film radiography in children.
    Bankvall G; Håkansson HA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1982 May; 53(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 6954429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.
    Dula K; Mini R; van der Stelt PF; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 11280366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Absorbed doses at varying tube voltage in lateral cephalography.
    Eliasson S; Julin P; Philip A; Stenström B
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(3):117-27. PubMed ID: 3860993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Technique-dependent decrease in thyroid absorbed dose for dental radiography.
    Wood RE; Bristow RG; Clark GM; Nussbaum C; Taylor KW
    Health Phys; 1989 Jun; 56(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 2722512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The radiation burden in high resolution panoramic radiography. The fanned exposure pattern and integral absorbed dose in free focus radiography.
    Jensen TW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1984; 13(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 6586592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Absorbed doses to critical organs from full mouth dental radiography].
    Zhang G; Yasuhiko O; Hidegiko Y
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Jan; 34(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 11776538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dose reduction in dental radiography.
    Horner K; Hirschmann PN
    J Dent; 1990 Aug; 18(4):171-84. PubMed ID: 2212199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Dose contributions to the Swedish population from oral radiography.
    Stenström B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1986; 40():1-62. PubMed ID: 3467441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Absorbed doses from temporomandibular joint radiography.
    Brooks SL; Lanzetta ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 Jun; 59(6):647-52. PubMed ID: 3859827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The value of thyroid shielding in intraoral radiography.
    Hoogeveen RC; Hazenoot B; Sanderink GC; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(5):20150407. PubMed ID: 27008105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography.
    Avendanio B; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Sokolowski TW
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Dec; 82(6):713-9. PubMed ID: 8974146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Dose exposure from analog and digital full mouth radiography and panoramic radiography].
    Kiefer H; Lambrecht JT; Roth J
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2004; 114(7):687-93. PubMed ID: 15360104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of panoramic and standard radiographic radiation exposures in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures.
    Ching M; Hase MP
    Med J Aust; 1987 Sep; 147(5):226, 228-9. PubMed ID: 3670171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Absorbed doses from intraoral radiography with special emphasis on collimator dimensions.
    Stenström B; Henrikson CO; Holm B; Richter S
    Swed Dent J; 1986; 10(1-2):59-71. PubMed ID: 3458320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Four-intraoral film radiographic examination on children imparting less radiation than pantomography.
    Locht S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1982 Feb; 90(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 6952548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Dental orthopantomography: survey of patient dose.
    Bartolotta A; Calenda E; Calicchia A; Indovina PL
    Radiology; 1983 Mar; 146(3):821-3. PubMed ID: 6828699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.