267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28513786)
1. 3-year survival rates of retained composite resin and ART sealants using two assessment criteria.
Hilgert LA; Leal SC; Freire GML; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Braz Oral Res; 2017 May; 31():e35. PubMed ID: 28513786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Caries-preventive effect of sealants produced with altered glass-ionomer materials, after 2 years.
Chen X; Du MQ; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):554-60. PubMed ID: 22300651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glass ionomer ART sealants in Chinese school children-6-year results.
Holmgren CJ; Lo EC; Hu D
J Dent; 2013 Sep; 41(9):764-70. PubMed ID: 23831419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.
Beiruti N; Frencken JE; van't Hof MA; Taifour D; van Palenstein Helderman WH
Caries Res; 2006; 40(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 16352882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do light cured ART conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants perform better than resin-composite sealants: a 4-year randomized clinical trial.
Zhang W; Chen X; Fan MW; Mulder J; Huysmans MC; Frencken JE
Dent Mater; 2014 May; 30(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 24602520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glass ionomer ART sealant and fluoride-releasing resin sealant in fissure caries prevention--results from a randomized clinical trial.
Liu BY; Xiao Y; Chu CH; Lo EC
BMC Oral Health; 2014 May; 14():54. PubMed ID: 24886444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retention Rate of Four Different Sealant Materials after Four Years.
Zhang W; Chen X; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(4):307-314. PubMed ID: 28752157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retention rates and caries-preventive effects of two different sealant materials: a randomised clinical trial.
Cabral RN; Faber J; Otero SAM; Hilgert LA; Leal SC
Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):3171-3177. PubMed ID: 29524027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Caries-preventive Effect of Supervised Toothbrushing and Sealants.
Hilgert LA; Leal SC; Mulder J; Creugers NH; Frencken JE
J Dent Res; 2015 Sep; 94(9):1218-24. PubMed ID: 26116491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of caries prevention with glass ionomer and composite resin fissure sealants.
Oba AA; Dülgergil T; Sönmez IS; Doğan S
J Formos Med Assoc; 2009 Nov; 108(11):844-8. PubMed ID: 19933027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treating High-Caries Risk Occlusal Surfaces in First Permanent Molars through Sealants and Supervised Toothbrushing: A 3-Year Cost-Effective Analysis.
Goldman A; Leal SC; de Amorim RG; Frencken JE
Caries Res; 2017; 51(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28954261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The state-of-the-art of ART sealants.
Frencken JE
Dent Update; 2014 Mar; 41(2):119-20, 122-4. PubMed ID: 24783880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.
Petrauskienė S; Saldūnaitė-Mikučionienė K; Narbutaitė J
Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 May; 60(5):. PubMed ID: 38792939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Frequency of remnants of sealants left behind in pits and fissures of occlusal surfaces after 2 and 3 years.
Hu X; Zhang W; Fan M; Mulder J; Frencken JE
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 26961522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-cost glass ionomer cement as ART sealant in permanent molars: a randomized clinical trial.
Hesse D; Bonifácio CC; Guglielmi Cde A; Franca Cd; Mendes FM; Raggio DP
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26039906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].
Liu YJ; Chang Q; Rong WS; Zhao XL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jul; 53(7):437-442. PubMed ID: 29996359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.
Antonson SA; Antonson DE; Brener S; Crutchfield J; Larumbe J; Michaud C; Yazici AR; Hardigan PC; Alempour S; Evans D; Ocanto R
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Feb; 143(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 22298552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.
Ulusu T; Odabaş ME; Tüzüner T; Baygin O; Sillelioğlu H; Deveci C; Gökdoğan FG; Altuntaş A
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2012 Apr; 13(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 22449810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A 3-year clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer cements used as fissure sealants.
Pereira AC; Pardi V; Mialhe FL; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM
Am J Dent; 2003 Feb; 16(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12744408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microcavitated (ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial.
Muñoz-Sandoval C; Gambetta-Tessini K; Giacaman RA
J Dent; 2019 Sep; 88():103163. PubMed ID: 31276747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
