BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28514203)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of MR Imaging-guided Strategies for Detection of Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men.
    Pahwa S; Schiltz NK; Ponsky LE; Lu Z; Griswold MA; Gulani V
    Radiology; 2017 Oct; 285(1):157-166. PubMed ID: 28514203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimising the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in the Era of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis Based on the Prostate MR Imaging Study (PROMIS).
    Faria R; Soares MO; Spackman E; Ahmed HU; Brown LC; Kaplan R; Emberton M; Sculpher MJ
    Eur Urol; 2018 Jan; 73(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28935163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer.
    Cerantola Y; Dragomir A; Tanguay S; Bladou F; Aprikian A; Kassouf W
    Urol Oncol; 2016 Mar; 34(3):119.e1-9. PubMed ID: 26602178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer: A Cost-effectiveness Modeling Study.
    Patel S; Rongen JJ; Fütterer JJ; Boltyenkov A; Rovers MM
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Dec; 1(6):476-483. PubMed ID: 31158091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-Effectiveness Comparison of Imaging-Guided Prostate Biopsy Techniques: Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound, Direct In-Bore MRI, and Image Fusion.
    Venderink W; Govers TM; de Rooij M; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 May; 208(5):1058-1063. PubMed ID: 28225639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted fusion biopsy for early detection of prostate cancer.
    Barnett CL; Davenport MS; Montgomery JS; Wei JT; Montie JE; Denton BT
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 29388388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI-guided biopsy in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro-simulation model.
    Getaneh AM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):4046-4053. PubMed ID: 33991077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
    Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
    Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-Effectiveness of Annual Prostate MRI and Potential MRI-Guided Biopsy After Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Results.
    Yun H; Kim J; Gandhe A; Nelson B; Hu JC; Gulani V; Margolis D; Schackman BR; Jalali A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Nov; 6(11):e2344856. PubMed ID: 38019516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
    Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.
    Kuru TH; Roethke MC; Seidenader J; Simpfendörfer T; Boxler S; Alammar K; Rieker P; Popeneciu VI; Roth W; Pahernik S; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
    J Urol; 2013 Oct; 190(4):1380-6. PubMed ID: 23608676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time contrast-enhanced transrectal US-guided prostate biopsy: diagnostic accuracy in men with previously negative biopsy results and positive MR imaging findings.
    Cornelis F; Rigou G; Le Bras Y; Coutouly X; Hubrecht R; Yacoub M; Pasticier G; Robert G; Grenier N
    Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 23657887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
    Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
    Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Current State of MR Imaging-targeted Biopsy Techniques for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Verma S; Choyke PL; Eberhardt SC; Oto A; Tempany CM; Turkbey B; Rosenkrantz AB
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):343-356. PubMed ID: 29045233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-Bore 3-T MR-guided Transrectal Targeted Prostate Biopsy: Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2-based Diagnostic Performance for Detection of Prostate Cancer.
    Tan N; Lin WC; Khoshnoodi P; Asvadi NH; Yoshida J; Margolis DJ; Lu DS; Wu H; Sung KH; Lu DY; Huang J; Raman SS
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):130-139. PubMed ID: 27861110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incorporating Biomarkers into the Primary Prostate Biopsy Setting: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Sathianathen NJ; Kuntz KM; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk NL; Bolton DM; Murphy DG; Weight CJ; Konety BR
    J Urol; 2018 Dec; 200(6):1215-1220. PubMed ID: 29906434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
    Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography].
    Durmus T; Stephan C; Grigoryev M; Diederichs G; Saleh M; Slowinski T; Maxeiner A; Thomas A; Fischer T
    Rofo; 2013 May; 185(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 23420313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.