These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28514522)

  • 1. Use of Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women with Physical or Sensory Disabilities.
    Wu JP; McKee KS; McKee MM; Meade MA; Plegue MA; Sen A
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2017 Sep; 49(3):141-147. PubMed ID: 28514522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contraceptive use at last intercourse among reproductive-aged women with disabilities: an analysis of population-based data from seven states.
    Haynes RM; Boulet SL; Fox MH; Carroll DD; Courtney-Long E; Warner L
    Contraception; 2018 Jun; 97(6):538-545. PubMed ID: 29253580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contraceptive use by disability status: new national estimates from the National Survey of Family Growth.
    Mosher W; Hughes RB; Bloom T; Horton L; Mojtabai R; Alhusen JL
    Contraception; 2018 Jun; 97(6):552-558. PubMed ID: 29596784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contraceptive knowledge and use among women with intellectual, physical, or sensory disabilities: A systematic review.
    Horner-Johnson W; Moe EL; Stoner RC; Klein KA; Edelman AB; Eden KB; Andresen EM; Caughey AB; Guise JM
    Disabil Health J; 2019 Apr; 12(2):139-154. PubMed ID: 30473221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraceptive failure, method-related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Trussell J; Vaughan B
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):64-72, 93. PubMed ID: 10224544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in Prenatal Care by Presence and Type of Maternal Disability.
    Horner-Johnson W; Biel FM; Caughey AB; Darney BG
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Mar; 56(3):376-382. PubMed ID: 30777157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current and past depressive symptoms and contraceptive effectiveness level method selected among women seeking reproductive health services.
    Steinberg JR; Adler NE; Thompson KM; Westhoff C; Harper CC
    Soc Sci Med; 2018 Oct; 214():20-25. PubMed ID: 30138841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Female sterilization is more common among women with physical and/or sensory disabilities than women without disabilities in the United States.
    Wu JP; McKee MM; Mckee KS; Meade MA; Plegue M; Sen A
    Disabil Health J; 2017 Jul; 10(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28110980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in the use of effective and long-acting reversible contraception in Vietnam.
    Asad S; Hebert C; Andridge R; Nguyen N; Gallo MF
    Contraception; 2019 Mar; 99(3):165-169. PubMed ID: 30503505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
    Fu H; Darroch JE; Haas T; Ranjit N
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(2):56-63. PubMed ID: 10224543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with lack of effective contraception among obese women in the United States.
    Callegari LS; Nelson KM; Arterburn DE; Prager SW; Schiff MA; Schwarz EB
    Contraception; 2014 Sep; 90(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 24950888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Historical survey of modern reversible contraceptive methods].
    Mbabajende V
    Imbonezamuryango; 1986 Apr; (5):14-7. PubMed ID: 12268230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condoms for dual protection: patterns of use with highly effective contraceptive methods.
    Pazol K; Kramer MR; Hogue CJ
    Public Health Rep; 2010; 125(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 20297747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Postpartum contraception: initiation and effectiveness in a large universal healthcare system.
    Brunson MR; Klein DA; Olsen CH; Weir LF; Roberts TA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):55.e1-55.e9. PubMed ID: 28257962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contraceptive Use Among Women with Prediabetes and Diabetes in a US National Sample.
    Britton LE; Hussey JM; Berry DC; Crandell JL; Brooks JL; Bryant AG
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2019 Jan; 64(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 30548397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Provision of Moderately and Highly Effective Reversible Contraception to Insured Women With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
    Wu J; Zhang J; Mitra M; Parish SL; Minama Reddy GK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Sep; 132(3):565-574. PubMed ID: 30095771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Initiation and continuation of long-acting reversible contraception in the United States military healthcare system.
    Chiles DP; Roberts TA; Klein DA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):328.e1-9. PubMed ID: 27005514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contraceptive practices and trends in France.
    Toulemon L; Leridon H
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(3):114-20. PubMed ID: 9635259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unplanned pregnancy and contraceptive use in Hull and East Yorkshire.
    Bexhell H; Guthrie K; Cleland K; Trussell J
    Contraception; 2016 Mar; 93(3):233-5. PubMed ID: 26519645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contraceptive Use Among Nonpregnant and Postpartum Women at Risk for Unintended Pregnancy, and Female High School Students, in the Context of Zika Preparedness - United States, 2011-2013 and 2015.
    Boulet SL; D'Angelo DV; Morrow B; Zapata L; Berry-Bibee E; Rivera M; Ellington S; Romero L; Lathrop E; Frey M; Williams T; Goldberg H; Warner L; Harrison L; Cox S; Pazol K; Barfield W; Jamieson DJ; Honein MA; Kroelinger CD
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2016 Aug; 65(30):780-7. PubMed ID: 27490117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.