These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28514701)

  • 1. A biased opinion: Demonstration of cognitive bias on a fingerprint matching task through knowledge of DNA test results.
    Stevenage SV; Bennett A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jul; 276():93-106. PubMed ID: 28514701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
    Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
    J Forensic Sci; 2024 Sep; 69(5):1740-1757. PubMed ID: 38922874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions.
    Chiam SL; Dror IE; Huber CD; Higgins D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110997. PubMed ID: 34536753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Putting bias into context: The role of familiarity in identification.
    Searston RA; Tangen JM; Eva KW
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Feb; 40(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 26301709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
    Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive and contextual influences in determination of latent fingerprint suitability for identification judgments.
    Fraser-Mackenzie PA; Dror IE; Wertheim K
    Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):144-53. PubMed ID: 23601721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
    Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
    He N; Wang L; Hao H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of human-technology cooperation and distributed cognition in forensic science: biasing effects of AFIS contextual information on human experts.
    Dror IE; Wertheim K; Fraser-Mackenzie P; Walajtys J
    J Forensic Sci; 2012 Mar; 57(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 22212067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications.
    Dror IE; Charlton D; Péron AE
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jan; 156(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 16325362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fact or friction: Examination of the transparency, reliability and sufficiency of the ACE-V method of fingerprint analysis.
    Stevenage SV; Pitfield C
    Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Oct; 267():145-156. PubMed ID: 27611955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
    Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
    Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expertise in fingerprint identification.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Nov; 58(6):1519-30. PubMed ID: 23786258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human matching performance of genuine crime scene latent fingerprints.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM; McCarthy DJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Feb; 38(1):84-93. PubMed ID: 23876092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does contextual information bias bitemark comparisons?
    Osborne NK; Woods S; Kieser J; Zajac R
    Sci Justice; 2014 Jul; 54(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 25002044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The nature of expertise in fingerprint matching: experts can do a lot with a little.
    Thompson MB; Tangen JM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114759. PubMed ID: 25517509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Training and performance measures for novices to the area of fingerprint analysis.
    Stevenage SV; Bennett A; Pitfield C
    Data Brief; 2017 Aug; 13():641-643. PubMed ID: 28725666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.