BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28515004)

  • 1. Animal breeding strategies can improve meat quality attributes within entire populations.
    Berry DP; Conroy S; Pabiou T; Cromie AR
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():6-18. PubMed ID: 28515004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. From phenotyping towards breeding strategies: using in vivo indicator traits and genetic markers to improve meat quality in an endangered pig breed.
    Biermann AD; Yin T; König von Borstel UU; Rübesam K; Kuhn B; König S
    Animal; 2015 Jun; 9(6):919-27. PubMed ID: 25690016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management.
    Picard B; Lebret B; Cassar-Malek I; Liaubet L; Berri C; Le Bihan-Duval E; Hocquette JF; Renand G
    Meat Sci; 2015 Nov; 109():18-26. PubMed ID: 26002117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Economic evaluation of genomic selection in small ruminants: a sheep meat breeding program.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Lemarié S; Fugeray-Scarbel A; Elsen JM
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 26446712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential benefits of genomic selection on genetic gain of small ruminant breeding programs.
    Shumbusho F; Raoul J; Astruc JM; Palhiere I; Elsen JM
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Aug; 91(8):3644-57. PubMed ID: 23736059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of marker-assisted selection in animal breeding and biotechnology.
    Williams JL
    Rev Sci Tech; 2005 Apr; 24(1):379-91. PubMed ID: 16110903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Increased genetic gains in sheep, beef and dairy breeding programs from using female reproductive technologies combined with optimal contribution selection and genomic breeding values.
    Granleese T; Clark SA; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Sep; 47(1):70. PubMed ID: 26370143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic and phenotypic correlations between performance traits with meat quality and carcass characteristics in commercial crossbred pigs.
    Miar Y; Plastow G; Bruce H; Moore S; Manafiazar G; Kemp R; Charagu P; Huisman A; van Haandel B; Zhang C; McKay R; Wang Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110105. PubMed ID: 25350845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genetic parameters for carcass composition and pork quality estimated in a commercial production chain.
    van Wijk HJ; Arts DJ; Matthews JO; Webster M; Ducro BJ; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2005 Feb; 83(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 15644503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genetic relationships between sex-specific traits in beef cattle: mature weight, weight adjusted for body condition score, height and body condition score of cows, and carcass traits of their steer relatives.
    Nephawe KA; Cundiff LV; Dikeman ME; Crouse JD; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Mar; 82(3):647-53. PubMed ID: 15032420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in commercial crossbred pigs.
    Miar Y; Plastow GS; Moore SS; Manafiazar G; Charagu P; Kemp RA; Van Haandel B; Huisman AE; Zhang CY; McKay RM; Bruce HL; Wang Z
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2869-84. PubMed ID: 24778330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
    König S; Swalve HH
    J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of molecular breeding values for Warner-Bratzler shear force and carcass traits of beef cattle - an independent validation study.
    Akanno EC; Plastow G; Woodward BW; Bauck S; Okut H; Wu XL; Sun C; Aalhus JL; Moore SS; Miller SP; Wang Z; Basarab JA
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2896-904. PubMed ID: 24802042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selection in backcross programmes.
    Hospital F
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2005 Jul; 360(1459):1503-11. PubMed ID: 16048792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic selection: Status in different species and challenges for breeding.
    Stock KF; Reents R
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2013 Sep; 48 Suppl 1():2-10. PubMed ID: 23962210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genetic analysis on growth and carcass traits in Nelore cattle.
    Zuin RG; Buzanskas ME; Caetano SL; Venturini GC; Guidolin DG; Grossi DA; Chud TC; Paz CC; Lôbo RB; Munari DP
    Meat Sci; 2012 Jul; 91(3):352-7. PubMed ID: 22405874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prediction of genomic breeding values for growth, carcass and meat quality traits in a multi-breed sheep population using a HD SNP chip.
    Brito LF; Clarke SM; McEwan JC; Miller SP; Pickering NK; Bain WE; Dodds KG; Sargolzaei M; Schenkel FS
    BMC Genet; 2017 Jan; 18(1):7. PubMed ID: 28122512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genetic parameters for the weights and yields of carcass cuts in Chianina cattle.
    Sarti FM; Pieramati C; Lubricchio E; Giontella A; Lasagna E; Panella F
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4099-103. PubMed ID: 23881686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.