These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516361)

  • 1. Familiarity with Own Population's Appearance Influences Facial Preferences.
    Batres C; Kannan M; Perrett DI
    Hum Nat; 2017 Sep; 28(3):344-354. PubMed ID: 28516361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of the digital divide on face preferences in El Salvador: people without internet access prefer more feminine men, more masculine women, and women with higher adiposity.
    Batres C; Perrett DI
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e100966. PubMed ID: 25006801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.
    Liao HI; Shimojo S; Yeh SL
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 23356560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal changes in neural response patterns to faces varying in visual familiarity.
    Natu VS; O'Toole AJ
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():151-9. PubMed ID: 25524650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Familiarity on Viewpoint Adaptation for Self-Face and Other-Face Images.
    Nevi A; Cicali F; Caudek C
    Perception; 2016 Jul; 45(7):823-43. PubMed ID: 27165718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. For Your Local Eyes Only: Culture-Specific Face Typicality Influences Perceptions of Trustworthiness.
    Sofer C; Dotsch R; Oikawa M; Oikawa H; Wigboldus DHJ; Todorov A
    Perception; 2017 Aug; 46(8):914-928. PubMed ID: 28152651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Urban/rural differences in body weight: evidence for social selection and causation hypotheses in Finland.
    Jokela M; Kivimäki M; Elovainio M; Viikari J; Raitakari OT; Keltikangas-Järvinen L
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 68(5):867-75. PubMed ID: 19147263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microbes and masculinity: Does exposure to pathogenic cues alter women's preferences for male facial masculinity and beardedness?
    McIntosh TL; Lee AJ; Sidari MJ; Stower RE; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178206. PubMed ID: 28594843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity.
    Carr EW; Huber DE; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R; Halberstadt J; Winkielman P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jun; 112(6):787-812. PubMed ID: 28368135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The development of mirror self-recognition in different sociocultural contexts.
    Kärtner J; Keller H; Chaudhary N; Yovsi RD
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2012 Dec; 77(4):vii-viii, 1-87. PubMed ID: 23153268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body image preference in the United States and rural Thailand: an exploratory study.
    Sharps MJ; Price-Sharps JL; Hanson J
    J Psychol; 2001 Sep; 135(5):518-26. PubMed ID: 11804005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A familiarity disadvantage for remembering specific images of faces.
    Armann RG; Jenkins R; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):571-80. PubMed ID: 26594877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study.
    Tanaka JW; Kiefer M; Bukach CM
    Cognition; 2004 Aug; 93(1):B1-9. PubMed ID: 15110726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Positive body image: inter-ethnic and rural-urban differences among an indigenous sample from Malaysian Borneo.
    Swami V; Kannan K; Furnham A
    Int J Soc Psychiatry; 2012 Nov; 58(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 21821633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring the motion advantage: evaluating the contribution of familiarity and differences in facial motion.
    Butcher N; Lander K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 May; 70(5):919-929. PubMed ID: 26822035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conjunction faces alter confidence-accuracy relations for old faces.
    Reinitz MT; Loftus GR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jun; 43(6):837-850. PubMed ID: 27736116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.
    Taya F; Gupta S; Farber I; Mullette-Gillman OA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108515. PubMed ID: 25247886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Memory for faces with emotional expressions in Alzheimer's disease and healthy older participants: positivity effect is not only due to familiarity.
    Sava AA; Krolak-Salmon P; Delphin-Combe F; Cloarec M; Chainay H
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Jan; 24(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 26873302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Familiarity for famous faces and names is not equally subtended by the right and left temporal poles. Evidence from an rTMS study.
    Ranieri F; Ferraccioli M; Stampanoni Bassi M; Musumeci G; Di Lazzaro V; Gainotti G; Marra C
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2015 Nov; 125():15-23. PubMed ID: 26211873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.