These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516694)

  • 1. Poster - Thur Eve - 56: Verification of buildup region dose calculation of a treatment planning system.
    Bassey B; Sidhu N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4635. PubMed ID: 28516694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
    Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Commissioning Varian enhanced dynamic wedge in the PINNACLE treatment planning system using Gafchromic EBT film.
    Fontanarosa D; Orlandini LC; Andriani I; Bernardi L
    Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4504-10. PubMed ID: 19928081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SU-E-T-17: Comparison of MCNP5 Calculations in the Buildup Region with Plane Parallel Ionization Chamber Measurements for 6 and 18 MV Photon Beams.
    Abbas H; Satti J; MacDonald C
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part9):3706. PubMed ID: 28519055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan for a static and dynamic 6 MV photon beam.
    Magaddino V; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Schmidhalter D; Hirschi L; Fix MK
    Z Med Phys; 2011 May; 21(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 21239148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. SU-E-T-289: On the Use of a Diode Array for the Commissioning of Dynamically-Wedged Asymmetric Fields Generated by Varian EDW's in the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System.
    Ahmad M; Liu W; Deng J; Nguyen K; Wu D; Chen Z; Moran M; Nath R
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part14):3770. PubMed ID: 28517261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dose discrepancies in the buildup region and their impact on dose calculations for IMRT fields.
    Hsu SH; Moran JM; Chen Y; Kulasekere R; Roberson PL
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2043-53. PubMed ID: 20527537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SU-E-T-143: Effect of Physical and Virtual Wedges on the Surface Dose at Various SSD for 6 and 15 MV Photon Beam.
    Yadav G; Sinha SN; Ashokkumar S; Raman K; Mishra M; Thiyagarajan R; Yadav RS
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3736. PubMed ID: 28517136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of superficial dosimetry between treatment planning system and measurement for several breast cancer treatment techniques.
    Akino Y; Das IJ; Bartlett GK; Zhang H; Thompson E; Zook JE
    Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011714. PubMed ID: 23298084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. SU-E-T-527: Assessment of Field-Junction Dosimetry: Pinnacle V9.0 versus Film (EBT2).
    Melancon A; Gillin M; Tailor R
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3826-3827. PubMed ID: 28518518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Photon beam skin dose analyses for different clinical setups.
    Kim S; Liu CR; Zhu TC; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 9650173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Validation of OSLD and a treatment planning system for surface dose determination in IMRT treatments.
    Zhuang AH; Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081720. PubMed ID: 25086530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Poster - Thur Eve - 23: Statistical analysis and verification of the percentage depth dose calculation based on the tissue maximum ratio in external beam radiotherapy.
    Isa M; Iqbal K; Afzal M; Buzdar S; Chow J
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4628-4629. PubMed ID: 28516690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing of the analytical anisotropic algorithm for photon dose calculation.
    Van Esch A; Tillikainen L; Pyykkonen J; Tenhunen M; Helminen H; Siljamäki S; Alakuijala J; Paiusco M; Lori M; Huyskens DP
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4130-48. PubMed ID: 17153392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Skin dose estimation for various beam modifiers and source-to-surface distances for 6MV photons.
    Yadav G; Yadav RS; Kumar A
    J Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 34(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 20098542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Perturbation effect of parallel-plate ionization chambers on buildup dose measurements in transverse magnetic fields.
    Matsuoka T; Araki F; Ohno T
    Phys Med; 2019 Mar; 59():112-116. PubMed ID: 30928059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Poster - Thur Eve - 45: Commissioning of the Varian ECLIPSE eMC algorithm for clinical electron treatment planning.
    Serban M; Ruo R; Sarfehnia A; Parker W; Evans M
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4633. PubMed ID: 28516693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Theoretical and experimental validation of treatment planning for narrow MLC defined photon fields.
    Lydon JM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2701-14. PubMed ID: 15901964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of various beamlet sizes for IMRT with 6 MV photons.
    Sohn JW; Dempsey JF; Suh TS; Low DA
    Med Phys; 2003 Sep; 30(9):2432-9. PubMed ID: 14528965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verification of treatment parameter transfer by means of electronic portal dosimetry.
    Nijsten SM; Minken AW; Lambin P; Bruinvis IA
    Med Phys; 2004 Feb; 31(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 15000620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.