92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516699)
1. Poster - Thur Eve - 60: Physical and dynamic wedges in radiotherapy for rectal cancer: A dosimetric comparison.
Isa M; Iqbal K; Afzal M; Buzdar S; Chow J
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4636. PubMed ID: 28516699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric Comparison of Treatment Plans Using Physical Wedge and Enhanced Dynamic Wedge for the Planning of Breast Radiotherapy.
Gopalakrishnan Z; Nair RK; Raghukumar P; Sarin B
J Med Phys; 2018; 43(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 29628633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multienergetic verification of dynamic wedge angles in medical accelerators using multichannel linear array.
Kowalik A; Litoborski M
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2013; 18(4):220-34. PubMed ID: 24416557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.
Saminathan S; Manickam R; Supe SS
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2011; 17(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 24376991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of physical wedge and enhanced dynamic wedge in inhomogeneous medium using Monte Carlo simulations.
Mahdavi SR; Mahmoudi A; Geraily G; Mostaar A; Esmaili G
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother; 2021; 26(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 33948303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Poster - Thur Eve - 41: Effect of beam symmetry on enhanced dynamic wedge quality assurance and tolerance levels.
Meyer T; Hudson A
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4632. PubMed ID: 28516712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Poster - Thurs Eve-10: The accuracy of MU calculations for enhanced dynamic wedge with the Varian's anisotropic analytical algorithm.
Salomons G; Kerr A; Mei X; Patel D
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3403. PubMed ID: 28512830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Poster - Thur Eve - 61: A dosimetric comparison between single-arc and double-arc prostate VMAT plans.
Chow J; Jiang R
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4636. PubMed ID: 28516688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Poster - Thur Eve - 66: A planning comparison between RapidArc and intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Jiang R; Fleck A; Schaly B; Charland P; Zhan L; Alliet K; Rachakonda R; Osei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part4):4637. PubMed ID: 28516640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of beam hardening effect of physical and enhanced dynamic wedges at bladder inhomogeneity using EBT3 film dosimeter.
Geraily G; Sharafi N; Shirazi A; Esfehani M; Masoudifar M; Rajab BE
J Cancer Res Ther; 2017; 13(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 28508840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Studying wedge factors and beam profiles for physical and enhanced dynamic wedges.
Ahmad M; Hussain A; Muhammad W; Rizvi SQ; Matiullah
J Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 35(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 20177568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SU-E-T-587: Whole IMRT, Hybrid IMRT and 3D Conformal Plan a Dosimetric Comparison for Large Target.
Sharma S; Manigandan D; Gandhi A; Subramani V; Sharma D; Kumar P; Julka P; Rath G
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3840-3841. PubMed ID: 28517101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical implementation of enhanced dynamic wedges into the Pinnacle treatment planning system: Monte Carlo validation and patient-specific QA.
Ahmad M; Deng J; Lund MW; Chen Z; Kimmett J; Moran MS; Nath R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 19098353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of dosimetric characteristics of Siemens virtual and physical wedges.
Zhu XR; Gillin MT; Jursinic PA; Lopez F; Grimm DF; Rownd JJ
Med Phys; 2000 Oct; 27(10):2267-77. PubMed ID: 11099193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SU-E-T-440: Dosimetry Parameter Comparison between Field-In-Field Technique and Conventional Physical Wedge Technique for Whole Breast Radiation Treatment.
Su M; Ayzenberg V; Li W
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3806. PubMed ID: 28517232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric comparison of flattened and unflattened beams for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of stage I non-small cell lung cancer.
Hrbacek J; Lang S; Graydon SN; Klöck S; Riesterer O
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031709. PubMed ID: 24593713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The dosimetric effects of photon energy on the quality of prostate volumetric modulated arc therapy.
Mattes MD; Tai C; Lee A; Ashamalla H; Ikoro NC
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(1):e39-44. PubMed ID: 24621430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SU-E-T-289: On the Use of a Diode Array for the Commissioning of Dynamically-Wedged Asymmetric Fields Generated by Varian EDW's in the Pinnacle Treatment Planning System.
Ahmad M; Liu W; Deng J; Nguyen K; Wu D; Chen Z; Moran M; Nath R
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part14):3770. PubMed ID: 28517261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and dynamic conformal arc therapy in stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas.
Lee TF; Chao PJ; Wang CY; Lan JH; Huang YJ; Hsu HC; Sung CC; Su TJ; Lian SL; Fang FM
Med Dosim; 2011; 36(1):62-70. PubMed ID: 20188537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Dosimetric comparison of two arc-based stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for early-stage lung cancer.
Liu H; Ye J; Kim JJ; Deng J; Kaur MS; Chen ZJ
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 25499078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
