BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516719)

  • 1. Poster - Thur Eve - 47: Evaluation of the ArcCHECK device for commissioning and patient-specific QA.
    Shahine B; Badragan I; Ramaseshan R
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4633. PubMed ID: 28516719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK to detect errors in 6MV FFF VMAT delivery of brain SABR using ROC analysis.
    Tattenberg S; Hyde D; Milette MP; Parodi K; Araujo C; Carlone M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 22(6):35-44. PubMed ID: 34021691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) quality assurance (QA) systems: sensitivity analysis to machine errors.
    Liang B; Liu B; Zhou F; Yin FF; Wu Q
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Nov; 11(1):146. PubMed ID: 27821135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A novel method for routine quality assurance of volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Wang Q; Dai J; Zhang K
    Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101712. PubMed ID: 24089902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Commissioning and quality assurance for VMAT delivery systems: An efficient time-resolved system using real-time EPID imaging.
    Zwan BJ; Barnes MP; Hindmarsh J; Lim SB; Lovelock DM; Fuangrod T; O'Connor DJ; Keall PJ; Greer PB
    Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):3909-3922. PubMed ID: 28564208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. IMRT QA and gamma comparisons: The impact of detector geometry, spatial sampling, and delivery technique on gamma comparison sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2021 Sep; 48(9):5367-5381. PubMed ID: 34036596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Poster - Thur Eve - 10: Long term stability of VMAT quality assurance parameters using an EPID.
    Pekar J; Diamond KR
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part2):4626. PubMed ID: 28516539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Determining the optimal dosimetric leaf gap setting for rounded leaf-end multileaf collimator systems by simple test fields.
    Yao W; Farr JB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 16(4):65-77. PubMed ID: 26218999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Filmless methods for quality assurance of Tomotherapy using ArcCHECK.
    Yang B; Wong WK; Geng H; Lam WW; Ho YW; Kwok WM; Cheung KY; Yu SK
    Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 44(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 28044341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation.
    Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the use of the MLC dosimetric leaf gap as a quality control tool for accurate dynamic IMRT delivery.
    Mei X; Nygren I; Villarreal-Barajas JE
    Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):2246-55. PubMed ID: 21626959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Detecting MLC modeling errors using radiomics-based machine learning in patient-specific QA with an EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Sakai M; Nakano H; Kawahara D; Tanabe S; Takizawa T; Narita A; Yamada T; Sakai H; Ueda M; Sasamoto R; Kaidu M; Aoyama H; Ishikawa H; Utsunomiya S
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):991-1002. PubMed ID: 33382467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Poster - Thur Eve - 30: Comparison of treatment planning and delivery performance of VMAT versus IMRT.
    Bergman A; Vollans E; Duzenli C
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7Part3):4630. PubMed ID: 28516711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of 3-dimensional dose reconstruction system between fluence-based system and dose measurement-guided system.
    Nakaguchi Y; Ono T; Onitsuka R; Maruyama M; Shimohigashi Y; Kai Y
    Med Dosim; 2016; 41(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 27179708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SU-E-T-119: Evaluation of New VMAT and IMRT Planning QA Devices: Portal Dosimetry Vs Compass.
    Kum O; Shin H; Han Y
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3730. PubMed ID: 28517115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On using the dosimetric leaf gap to model the rounded leaf ends in VMAT/RapidArc plans.
    Szpala S; Cao F; Kohli K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 15(2):4484. PubMed ID: 24710433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for early stage prostate cancer: a technical note.
    Elith CA; Dempsey SE; Cao F; Farshadi A; Warren-Forward HM
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Dec; 61(4):261-266. PubMed ID: 25598980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical implementation of an exit detector-based dose reconstruction tool for helical tomotherapy delivery quality assurance.
    Deshpande S; Xing A; Metcalfe P; Holloway L; Vial P; Geurts M
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5457-5466. PubMed ID: 28737014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. WE-E-BRB-08: Establishing Comprehensive Quality Assurance Program for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - Clinical Study Using Control Point Analysis Software.
    Rong Y; Jia J; Sun J; Gupta N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part27):3957. PubMed ID: 28519971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.