These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516848)

  • 1. The Role of Psychopathic Traits in Female Sexual Coercion.
    Miller HA; Bouffard JA; DeHaan CA
    Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):479-492. PubMed ID: 28516848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sexually coercive tactics used by university students: a clear role for primary psychopathy.
    Muñoz LC; Khan R; Cordwell L
    J Pers Disord; 2011 Feb; 25(1):28-40. PubMed ID: 21309621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of coercive sexual tactics across 10 years in at-risk young men: developmental patterns and co-occurring problematic dating behaviors.
    Teten AL; Hall GC; Capaldi DM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Aug; 38(4):574-82. PubMed ID: 18286363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychopathic traits, gender, and motivations for sex: Putative paths to sexual coercion.
    Hoffmann AM; Verona E
    Aggress Behav; 2019 Sep; 45(5):527-536. PubMed ID: 31111500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychopathic Traits and Sexual Coercion Against Relationship Partners in Men and Women.
    Hoffmann AM; Verona E
    J Interpers Violence; 2021 Feb; 36(3-4):NP1788-1809NP. PubMed ID: 29380653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attachment and personality predicts engagement in sexual harassment by male and female college students.
    Mènard KS; Shoss NE; Pincus AL
    Violence Vict; 2010; 25(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 21287966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender differences in sexual harassment and coercion in college students: developmental, individual, and situational determinants.
    Ménard KS; Hall GC; Phung AH; Ghebrial MF; Martin L
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Oct; 18(10):1222-39. PubMed ID: 19771718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The associations among dark personalities and sexual tactics across different scenarios.
    Jones DN; Olderbak SG
    J Interpers Violence; 2014 Apr; 29(6):1050-70. PubMed ID: 24288187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perceptions of sexual coercion in heterosexual dating relationships: the role of aggressor gender and tactics.
    Oswald DL; Russel BL
    J Sex Res; 2006 Feb; 43(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16817071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.
    Goetz AT; Shackelford TK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Apr; 38(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 18415011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examining the Correlates of Women's Use of Sexual Coercion: Proposing an Explanatory Model.
    Bouffard JA; Bouffard LA; Miller HA
    J Interpers Violence; 2016 Aug; 31(13):2360-82. PubMed ID: 25810091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Verbal coercive sexual behavior among college students.
    Craig ME; Kalichman SC; Follingstad DR
    Arch Sex Behav; 1989 Oct; 18(5):421-34. PubMed ID: 2818172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual coercion experience and sexually coercive behavior: a population study of Swedish and Norwegian male youth.
    Seto MC; Kjellgren C; Priebe G; Mossige S; Svedin CG; Långström N
    Child Maltreat; 2010 Aug; 15(3):219-28. PubMed ID: 20460305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding perpetrators of nonphysical sexual coercion: characteristics of those who cross the line.
    Degue S; DiLillo D
    Violence Vict; 2004 Dec; 19(6):673-88. PubMed ID: 16004069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychopathic Personality as a Moderator of the Relationship Between Atypical Sexuality and Sexual Coercion Proclivity in the General Population.
    Thatcher AS; Wallace L; Fido D
    Sex Abuse; 2023 Oct; ():10790632231205799. PubMed ID: 37856577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Identifying the Manipulative Mating Methods Associated With Psychopathic Traits and BPD Features.
    Muñoz Centifanti LC; Thomson ND; Kwok AH
    J Pers Disord; 2016 Dec; 30(6):721-741. PubMed ID: 26623541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The use and acceptance of sexually aggressive tactics in college men.
    Warkentin JB; Gidycz CA
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jul; 22(7):829-50. PubMed ID: 17575065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coercive sexual strategies.
    Tyler KA; Hoyt DR; Whitbeck LB
    Violence Vict; 1998; 13(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 9650245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors associated with use of verbally coercive, incapacitated, and forcible sexual assault tactics in a longitudinal study of college men.
    Zinzow HM; Thompson M
    Aggress Behav; 2015 Jan; 41(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 27539872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing the propensity for sexual coaxing and coercion in relationships: factor structure, reliability, and validity of the tactics to obtain sex scale.
    Camilleri JA; Quinsey VL; Tapscott JL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):959-73. PubMed ID: 18607709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.