315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516855)
1. Victim Impact Statements: How Victim Social Class Affects Juror Decision Making.
Schweitzer K; Nuñez N
Violence Vict; 2017 Jun; 32(3):521-532. PubMed ID: 28516855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who is the victim anyway? The effects of bystander victim impact statements on mock juror sentencing decisions.
McGowan MG; Myers B
Violence Vict; 2004 Jun; 19(3):357-74. PubMed ID: 15631286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perceptions of domestic violence and mock jurors' sentencing decisions.
Kern R; Libkuman TM; Temple SL
J Interpers Violence; 2007 Dec; 22(12):1515-35. PubMed ID: 17993639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "But He's a Star Football Player!": How Social Status Influences Mock Jurors' Perceptions in a Sexual Assault Case.
Pica E; Sheahan C; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2020 Oct; 35(19-20):3963-3985. PubMed ID: 29294785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of race on jurors' perceptions of lethal police use of force.
Ewanation L; Maeder EM
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):53-67. PubMed ID: 36931849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial.
Forsterlee R; Forsterlee L; Horowitz IA; King E
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 16557616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of sex on mock jurors' verdicts across type of child abuse cases.
Pettalia J; Pozzulo JD; Reed J
Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Jul; 69():1-9. PubMed ID: 28415027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crime victims serving as jurors: is there bias present?
Culhane SE; Hosch HM; Weaver WG
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Dec; 28(6):649-59. PubMed ID: 15732651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Juror Decision-Making in a Child Trafficking Case: The Impact of Defendant and Victim Gender, Defendant Age, and Defendant Status.
Pica E; Hildenbrand A; Fraser L; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Sep; 38(17-18):10031-10054. PubMed ID: 37096978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
Batista LM; Myers W
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An attribution theory-based content analysis of mock jurors' deliberations regarding coerced confessions.
Stevenson MC; McCracken E; Watson A; Petty T; Plogher T
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Apr; 47(2):348-366. PubMed ID: 37053386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mock-Jurors' Judgements in a Sexual Assault Case: The Influence of Defendant Race and Occupational Status, Delayed Reporting, and Multiple Allegations.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2023 Jul; 38(13-14):7964-7989. PubMed ID: 36762531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Keep your bias to yourself: How deliberating with differently biased others affects mock-jurors' guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, memories, and evidence interpretation.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2017 Oct; 41(5):478-493. PubMed ID: 28714733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Sexual Assault on a University Campus.
Pica E; Sheahan CL; Pozzulo J
J Interpers Violence; 2021 May; 36(9-10):NP5447-NP5465. PubMed ID: 30239260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.
Sheahan CL; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2021 Jan; 36(1-2):938-956. PubMed ID: 29294918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. From the shadows into the light: How pretrial publicity and deliberation affect mock jurors' decisions, impressions, and memory.
Ruva CL; Guenther CC
Law Hum Behav; 2015 Jun; 39(3):294-310. PubMed ID: 25495716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Race and jurors' receptivity to mitigation in capital cases: the effect of jurors', defendants', and victims' race in combination.
Brewer TW
Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):529-45. PubMed ID: 15638208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
