315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28516855)
21. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
Lynch M; Haney C
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Chaos in the courtroom reconsidered: emotional bias and juror nullification.
Horowitz IA; Kerr NL; Park ES; Gockel C
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):163-81. PubMed ID: 16786405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.
Meaux LT; Cox J; Kopkin MR
Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):724-736. PubMed ID: 31984048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The impact of graphic photographic evidence on mock jurors' decisions in a murder trial: probative or prejudicial?
Douglas KS; Lyon DR; Ogloff JR
Law Hum Behav; 1997 Oct; 21(5):485-501. PubMed ID: 9374603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. N.C. Supreme Court upholds exclusion of HIV in jury selection.
AIDS Policy Law; 1995 Sep; 10(16):3-4. PubMed ID: 11362769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors' perceptions of child sexual assault.
Wiley TR; Bottoms BL
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):46-60. PubMed ID: 18404363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.
Hobson HM; Woodley J; Gamblen S; Brackely J; O'Neill F; Miles D; Westwood C
Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2023 Jan; 58(1):189-205. PubMed ID: 36087284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of mitigation evidence, ethnicity, and SES on death penalty decisions by European American and Latino venire persons.
Espinoza RK; Willis-Esqueda C
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2015 Apr; 21(2):288-99. PubMed ID: 25150818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving the Credibility of Child Sexual Assault Victims in Court: The Impact of a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner.
Golding JM; Wasarhaley NE; Lynch KR; Lippert A; Magyarics CL
Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):493-507. PubMed ID: 26294384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. White mock jurors' moral emotional responses to viewing female victim photographs depend on the victim's race.
Phalen HJ; Salerno JM; Adamoli M; Nadler J
Law Hum Behav; 2023 Dec; 47(6):666-685. PubMed ID: 38127550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Who Is the Rotten Apple? Mock Jurors' Views of Teacher-Student Sexual Contact.
Anderson A; Wingrove T; Fox P; McLean K; Styer E
J Interpers Violence; 2018 May; 33(9):1449-1471. PubMed ID: 26621035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Why the impact? Negative affective change as a mediator of the effects of victim impact statements.
Wevodau AL; Cramer RJ; Kehn A; Clark JW
J Interpers Violence; 2014 Nov; 29(16):2884-903. PubMed ID: 24664251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Credibility in the courtroom: how likeable should an expert witness be?
Brodsky SL; Neal TM; Cramer RJ; Ziemke MH
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(4):525-32. PubMed ID: 20019000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
Antonio ME
Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reaction of mock jurors to testimony of a court appointed expert.
Cooper J; Hall J
Behav Sci Law; 2000; 18(6):719-29. PubMed ID: 11180418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The effects of motive information and crime unusualness on jurors' judgments in insanity cases.
Pickel KL
Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):571-84. PubMed ID: 9833567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Effect of Delayed Reporting on Mock-Juror Decision-Making in the Era of #MeToo.
Fraser BM; Pica E; Pozzulo JD
J Interpers Violence; 2022 Jul; 37(13-14):NP11791-NP11810. PubMed ID: 33636996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Talking about a black man: the influence of defendant and character witness race on jurors' use of character evidence.
Maeder EM; Hunt JS
Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):608-20. PubMed ID: 21796674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
