204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517093)
1. SU-E-T-601: Dosimetric Evaluation of the Parameter Variation with Varying Calculation Grid Size in the IMRT Cases.
Markovic M; Stathakis S; Mavroidis P; Gutierrez A; Esquivel C; Papanikolau N
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3844. PubMed ID: 28517093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SU-E-T-621: Comprehensive Study of Head and Neck IMRT Parameters on Planning and Delivery Efficiency, Plan Quality, and Dose Accuracy.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Liu C; Yan G; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3849. PubMed ID: 28517495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of convolution, superposition, and fast superposition algorithms in conventional radiotherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques for various sites, done on CMS XIO planning system.
Muralidhar KR; Murthy NP; Raju AK; Sresty N
J Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 34(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 20126561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A study of IMRT planning parameters on planning efficiency, delivery efficiency, and plan quality.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Yan G; Kahler D; Gopal A; Amdur R; Liu C
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061704. PubMed ID: 23718583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The dosimetric and radiobiological impact of calculation grid size on head and neck IMRT.
Srivastava SP; Cheng CW; Das IJ
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2017; 7(3):209-217. PubMed ID: 27847266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for mesothelioma: impact of multileaf collimator leaf width and pencil beam size on planning quality and delivery efficiency.
Zhu XR; Prado K; Liu HH; Guerrero TM; Jeter M; Liao Z; Rice D; Forster K; Stevens CW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1525-34. PubMed ID: 16029815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Independent calculation-based verification of IMRT plans using a 3D dose-calculation engine.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Goozee G; Holloway L
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 23790325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of multileaf collimator leaf width on physical dose distributions in the treatment of CNS and head and neck neoplasms with intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Fiveash JB; Murshed H; Duan J; Hyatt M; Caranto J; Bonner JA; Popple RA
Med Phys; 2002 Jun; 29(6):1116-9. PubMed ID: 12094981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of IMRT and leaf width on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver and lung lesions.
Dvorak P; Georg D; Bogner J; Kroupa B; Dieckmann K; Pötter R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1572-81. PubMed ID: 15817364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do technological advances in linear accelerators improve dosimetric outcomes in stereotaxy? A head-on comparison of seven linear accelerators using volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic planning.
Sarkar B; Pradhan A; Munshi A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 27146771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SU-E-T-574: Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Radiation: A Dosimetric Comparison between VMAT Techniques and Fixed-Beam IMRT.
Qi S; Liu R; Lian J; Hu A; Song H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3837-3838. PubMed ID: 28517067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The inter- and intrafraction reproducibilities of three common IMRT delivery techniques.
Buckey CR; Stathakis S; Papanikolaou N
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4854-60. PubMed ID: 20964202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-T-388: Verification of Monitor Units and Dose Distributions in IMRT Plans Using Monte Carlo Algorithms on the E-IMRT Web Platform.
Pereira L; Martin Z; Mera M; Meilà N E; Vazquez J; Salgado M; Medina A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3793. PubMed ID: 28517234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. SU-E-T-385: Accelerated Beam Delivery with MLC Gaps in IMRT Fields.
Yang Y; Wong J; McNutt T; Tryggestad E; Le Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3793. PubMed ID: 28517216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases.
Cilla S; Deodato F; Digesù C; Macchia G; Picardi V; Ferro M; Sallustio G; De Spirito M; Piermattei A; Morganti AG
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):108-16. PubMed ID: 24342167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating dosimetric accuracy of flattening filter free compensator-based IMRT: measurements with diode arrays.
Robinson J; Opp D; Zhang G; Cashon K; Kozelka J; Hunt D; Walker L; Hoffe S; Shridhar R; Feygelman V
Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):342-52. PubMed ID: 22225304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
