105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517185)
1. SU-E-T-428: Class Solution for Prostate High Dose Rate Brachytherapy with Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing.
Sheth N; Mistry N; Chen Y; Yang C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3803. PubMed ID: 28517185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of inverse planning simulated annealing and geometrical optimization for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Hsu IC; Lessard E; Weinberg V; Pouliot J
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(3):147-52. PubMed ID: 15533807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of anatomy-based inverse planning with simulated annealing and graphical optimization for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
Morton GC; Sankreacha R; Halina P; Loblaw A
Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 18037356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urethra low-dose tunnels: validation of and class solution for generating urethra-sparing dose plans using inverse planning simulated annealing for prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy.
Cunha JA; Pouliot J; Weinberg V; Wang-Chesebro A; Roach M; Hsu IC
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(5):348-53. PubMed ID: 21937284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Early clinical experience with anatomy-based inverse planning dose optimization for high-dose-rate boost of the prostate.
Lachance B; Béliveau-Nadeau D; Lessard E; Chrétien M; Hsu IC; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L; Vigneault E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Sep; 54(1):86-100. PubMed ID: 12182978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric evaluation of manually and inversely optimized treatment planning for high dose rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Palmqvist T; Dybdahl Wanderås A; Langeland Marthinsen AB; Sundset M; Langdal I; Danielsen S; Toma-Dasu I
Acta Oncol; 2014 Aug; 53(8):1012-8. PubMed ID: 24975370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dosimetric comparison of volume-based and inverse planning simulated annealing-based dose optimizations for high-dose rate brachytherapy.
Pelagade S; Maddirala HR; Misra R; Suryanarayan U; Neema JP
Med Dosim; 2015; 40(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 25795565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomy-based inverse planning simulated annealing optimization in high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy: significant dosimetric advantage over other optimization techniques.
Jacob D; Raben A; Sarkar A; Grimm J; Simpson L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Nov; 72(3):820-7. PubMed ID: 18455325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of inverse optimisation methods versus forward optimisation in HDR brachytherapy of breast, cervical and prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Geszti G; Vízkeleti J; Ágoston P; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2019 Nov; 195(11):991-1000. PubMed ID: 31482321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Oncentra® Brachy IPSA and graphical optimisation techniques: a case study of HDR brachytherapy head and neck and prostate plans.
Jameson MG; Ohanessian L; Batumalai V; Patel V; Holloway LC
J Med Radiat Sci; 2015 Jun; 62(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 26229683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dosimetric comparison of graphical optimization and inverse planning simulated annealing for brachytherapy of cervical cancer.
Tang B; Liu X; Wang X; Kang S; Wang P; Li J; Orlandini LC
J Contemp Brachytherapy; 2019 Aug; 11(4):379-383. PubMed ID: 31523240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of inverse optimization algorithms for HDR/PDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning.
Dinkla AM; van der Laarse R; Kaljouw E; Pieters BR; Koedooder K; van Wieringen N; Bel A
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(2):279-88. PubMed ID: 25447341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of IPSA and HIPO inverse planning optimization algorithms for prostate HDR brachytherapy.
Panettieri V; Smith RL; Mason NJ; Millar JL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 15(6):5055. PubMed ID: 25493531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric impact of dwell time deviation constraint on inverse brachytherapy treatment planning and comparison with conventional optimization method for interstitial brachytherapy implants.
Roy S; Subramani V; Singh K; Rathi AK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2021; 17(2):463-470. PubMed ID: 34121693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimization for high-dose-rate brachytherapy of cervical cancer with adaptive simulated annealing and gradient descent.
Yao R; Templeton AK; Liao Y; Turian JV; Kiel KD; Chu JC
Brachytherapy; 2014; 13(4):352-60. PubMed ID: 24359671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of the dwell time deviation constraint (DTDC) parameter on dosimetry with IPSA optimisation for HDR prostate brachytherapy.
Smith RL; Panettieri V; Lancaster C; Mason N; Franich RD; Millar JL
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2015 Mar; 38(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 25481387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of prostate catheter displacement in inverse planning--simulated annealing and geometric optimization.
Reynés-Llompart G; Pino F; Modolell I; Gullón C; Pera J; Gutierrez C; Picón C
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(1):112-7. PubMed ID: 26612698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SU-E-T-426: Comparison of HDR Brachytherapy for Cervix Cancer Using an Adaptive Simulated Annealing Program and Oncentra- for Simultaneously Integrated Boost.
Yao R; Liao Y; Kiel K; Templeton A; Turian J; Chu J
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3802-3803. PubMed ID: 28517211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptation of the CVT algorithm for catheter optimization in high dose rate brachytherapy.
Poulin E; Fekete CA; Létourneau M; Fenster A; Pouliot J; Beaulieu L
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111724. PubMed ID: 24320432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asymmetric dose-volume optimization with smoothness control for rotating-shield brachytherapy.
Liu Y; Flynn RT; Kim Y; Wu X
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111709. PubMed ID: 25370623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
