153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517348)
1. SU-E-T-234: LET Measurement Using Nuclear Emulsion and Monte Carlo Simulation for Proton Beam.
Shin J; Cho S; Park S; Lee S; Kwak J; Kim S; Morishima K
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part13):3757. PubMed ID: 28517348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Experimental depth dose curves of a 67.5 MeV proton beam for benchmarking and validation of Monte Carlo simulation.
Faddegon BA; Shin J; Castenada CM; Ramos-Méndez J; Daftari IK
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):4199-210. PubMed ID: 26133619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.
Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Monte Carlo study for the calculation of the average linear energy transfer (LET) distributions for a clinical proton beam line and a radiobiological carbon ion beam line.
Romano F; Cirrone GA; Cuttone G; Rosa FD; Mazzaglia SE; Petrovic I; Fira AR; Varisano A
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jun; 59(12):2863-82. PubMed ID: 24828462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of the proton LET using thin film solar cells coated with scintillating powder.
Jeong S; Kim C; An S; Kwon YC; Pak SI; Cheon W; Shin D; Lim Y; Jeong JH; Kim H; Lee SB
Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1194-1204. PubMed ID: 36135795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SU-E-T-491: A FLUKA Monte Carlo Computational Model of a Scanning Proton Beam Therapy Nozzle at IU Proton Therapy Center.
Moskvin V; Cheng C; Anferov V; Nichiporov D; Zhao Q; Takashina M; Parola R; Das I
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3818. PubMed ID: 28517449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Proposed linear energy transfer areal detector for protons using radiochromic film.
Mayer R; Lin L; Fager M; Douglas D; McDonough J; Carabe A
Rev Sci Instrum; 2015 Apr; 86(4):044301. PubMed ID: 25933872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Monte Carlo pencil beam scanning model for proton treatment plan simulation using GATE/GEANT4.
Grevillot L; Bertrand D; Dessy F; Freud N; Sarrut D
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5203-19. PubMed ID: 21791731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perturbations of radiation field caused by titanium dental implants in pencil proton beam therapy.
Oancea C; Luu A; Ambrožová I; Mytsin G; Vondráček V; Davídková M
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215020. PubMed ID: 30372419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SU-E-T-481: Dosimetric Effects of Tissue Heterogeneity in Proton Therapy: Monte Carlo Simulation and Experimental Study Using Animal Tissue Phantoms.
Liu Y; Zheng Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3815-3816. PubMed ID: 28517434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Relative biological effectiveness variation along monoenergetic and modulated Bragg peaks of a 62-MeV therapeutic proton beam: a preclinical assessment.
Chaudhary P; Marshall TI; Perozziello FM; Manti L; Currell FJ; Hanton F; McMahon SJ; Kavanagh JN; Cirrone GA; Romano F; Prise KM; Schettino G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Sep; 90(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 24986743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Empirical model estimation of relative biological effectiveness for proton beam therapy.
Chen Y; Ahmad S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Apr; 149(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 21593038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biological effects of passive scattering and spot scanning proton beams at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak in single cells and multicell spheroids.
Nomura K; Iwata H; Toshito T; Omachi C; Nagayoshi J; Nakajima K; Ogino H; Shibamoto Y
Int J Radiat Biol; 2021; 97(5):695-703. PubMed ID: 33617430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microdosimetry of proton and carbon ions.
Liamsuwan T; Hultqvist M; Lindborg L; Uehara S; Nikjoo H
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081721. PubMed ID: 25086531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ionoacoustic characterization of the proton Bragg peak with submillimeter accuracy.
Assmann W; Kellnberger S; Reinhardt S; Lehrack S; Edlich A; Thirolf PG; Moser M; Dollinger G; Omar M; Ntziachristos V; Parodi K
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):567-74. PubMed ID: 25652477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-T-118: Characterization of EBT3 Films in Photon and Proton Beams.
Sorriaux J; Rossomme S; Kacperek A; Bertrand D; Vynckier S; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part11):3730. PubMed ID: 28517130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Determination of average LET of therapeutic proton beams using Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) detectors.
Sawakuchi GO; Sahoo N; Gasparian PB; Rodriguez MG; Archambault L; Titt U; Yukihara EG
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(17):4963-76. PubMed ID: 20693613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Depth absorbed dose and LET distributions of therapeutic 1H, 4He, 7Li, and 12C beams.
Kempe J; Gudowska I; Brahme A
Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):183-92. PubMed ID: 17278503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. LET dependence of the response of a PTW-60019 microDiamond detector in a 62MeV proton beam.
Rossomme S; Denis JM; Souris K; Delor A; Bartier F; Dumont D; Vynckier S; Palmans H
Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1135-8. PubMed ID: 27567088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Monte Carlo track structure simulation code for the full-slowing-down carbon projectiles of energies 1 keV u(-1)-10 MeV u(-1) in water.
Liamsuwan T; Nikjoo H
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 23318579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
