93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517495)
1. SU-E-T-621: Comprehensive Study of Head and Neck IMRT Parameters on Planning and Delivery Efficiency, Plan Quality, and Dose Accuracy.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Liu C; Yan G; Gopal A
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part20):3849. PubMed ID: 28517495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A study of IMRT planning parameters on planning efficiency, delivery efficiency, and plan quality.
Mittauer K; Lu B; Yan G; Kahler D; Gopal A; Amdur R; Liu C
Med Phys; 2013 Jun; 40(6):061704. PubMed ID: 23718583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SU-E-T-601: Dosimetric Evaluation of the Parameter Variation with Varying Calculation Grid Size in the IMRT Cases.
Markovic M; Stathakis S; Mavroidis P; Gutierrez A; Esquivel C; Papanikolau N
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3844. PubMed ID: 28517093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Poster - Thurs Eve-01: Comparison of clinical IMRT plan quality and delivery accuracy: Few large segments vs many small segments.
Sawchuk S; Karnas S; McCune K; Mulligan M; Dar R; Chen J
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7Part2):3401. PubMed ID: 28512831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamic MLC leaf sequencing for integrated linear accelerator control systems.
Popple RA; Brezovich IA
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6039-45. PubMed ID: 22047368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of anatomy-based, fluence-based and aperture-based treatment planning approaches for VMAT.
Rao M; Cao D; Chen F; Ye J; Mehta V; Wong T; Shepard D
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(21):6475-90. PubMed ID: 20959688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer.
Bertelsen A; Hansen CR; Johansen J; Brink C
Radiother Oncol; 2010 May; 95(2):142-8. PubMed ID: 20188427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT radiation modalities in treating brain and cranio-spinal tumors.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Delichas MG; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2009 Feb; 8(1):3-14. PubMed ID: 19166237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.
Sayre GA; Ruan D
Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of the number of control points has on isodose distributions in a dynamic multileaf collimator intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery.
Goraj A; de Boer SF
Med Dosim; 2012; 37(4):412-6. PubMed ID: 22572212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning.
Appenzoller LM; Michalski JM; Thorstad WL; Mutic S; Moore KL
Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7446-61. PubMed ID: 23231294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A quantitative study of IMRT delivery effects in commercial planning systems for the case of oesophagus and prostate tumours.
Seco J; Clark CH; Evans PM; Webb S
Br J Radiol; 2006 May; 79(941):401-8. PubMed ID: 16632620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SU-E-T-385: Accelerated Beam Delivery with MLC Gaps in IMRT Fields.
Yang Y; Wong J; McNutt T; Tryggestad E; Le Y
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3793. PubMed ID: 28517216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Independent calculation-based verification of IMRT plans using a 3D dose-calculation engine.
Arumugam S; Xing A; Goozee G; Holloway L
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):376-84. PubMed ID: 23790325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. IMRT planning parameter optimization for spine stereotactic radiosurgery.
Ayala GB; Doan KA; Ko HJ; Park PK; Santiago ED; Kuruvila SJ; Briere TM; Wen Z
Med Dosim; 2018 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 30193991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with multileaf collimators of different leaf widths: a comparison of achievable dose distributions.
Nill S; Tücking T; Münter MW; Oelfke U
Radiother Oncol; 2005 Apr; 75(1):106-11. PubMed ID: 15878108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
