95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517563)
1. SU-E-J-60: Comparison of CT-On-Rails and a 3D Surface Imaging System for Image Guided Pelvic Radiation Therapy for Both Supine and Prone Patient Positions.
Zhao H; Wang B; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Sarkar V; Huang Y; Szegedi M; Gonzalez V; Salter B
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3666. PubMed ID: 28517563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of surface matching and target matching for image-guided pelvic radiation therapy for both supine and prone patient positions.
Zhao H; Wang B; Sarkar V; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Huang YJ; Szegedi M; Huang L; Gonzalez V; Salter B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 May; 17(3):14-24. PubMed ID: 27167254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of surface guidance and target matching for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI).
Zhao H; Williams N; Poppe M; Sarkar V; Wang B; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Huang YJ; Kokeny K; Gaffney D; Salter B
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4717-4724. PubMed ID: 31509632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image-guidance protocol comparison: supine and prone set-up accuracy for pelvic radiation therapy.
Siddiqui F; Shi C; Papanikolaou N; Fuss M
Acta Oncol; 2008; 47(7):1344-50. PubMed ID: 18663650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SU-D-213CD-02: The Accuracy of AlignRT Guided Set-Up for Whole Breast and Chestwall Irradiation.
Wiant D; Pursley J; Sintay B
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part3):3617-3618. PubMed ID: 28517414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetric effects of the prone and supine positions on image guided localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.
Liu B; Lerma FA; Patel S; Amin P; Feng Y; Yi BY; Yu C
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 18207595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A phase II trial for the optimisation of treatment position in the radiation therapy of prostate cancer.
O'Neill L; Armstrong J; Buckney S; Assiri M; Cannon M; Holmberg O
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 18453021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SU-E-J-34: Influence of Prone versus Supine Patient Position on Localization with Image Guided Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer.
Sheth N; Kandala S; Chen Y; Yang C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3660. PubMed ID: 28517597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. SU-E-J-62: Comparison of Brainlab ExacTrac, AlignRT, and CBCT Positional Accuracy for SRS Set-Up on a TrueBeam STx.
Pursley J; Sintay B; Terrell J; Wiant D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part7):3666. PubMed ID: 28519806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Verification of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) alignment for proton breast and chest wall patients by comparison to CT-on-rails and kV-2D alignment.
Zhao H; Sarkar V; St James S; Paxton A; Su FF; Price RG; Dial C; Poppe M; Gaffney D; Salter B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 25(2):e14263. PubMed ID: 38268200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized trial of supine vs. prone positioning in patients undergoing escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer.
Bayley AJ; Catton CN; Haycocks T; Kelly V; Alasti H; Bristow R; Catton P; Crook J; Gospodarowicz MK; McLean M; Milosevic M; Warde P
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Jan; 70(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 15036850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. SU-E-J-70: A Study of the Correlation of 3D Surface Matching and KV Imaging for Chestwall IMRT.
Al-Hallaq H; Gerry E
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part7):3668. PubMed ID: 28519798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of prone versus supine positioning on small bowel dose with pelvic intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Gonzalez VJ; Hullett CR; Burt L; Rassiah-Szegedi P; Sarkar V; Tward JD; Hazard LJ; Huang YJ; Salter BJ; Gaffney DK
Adv Radiat Oncol; 2017; 2(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 28740937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Longitudinal Analysis of Plan-Based Streamlined Quality Assurance on Multiple Positioning Guidance Systems With Single Phantom Setup.
Zhou S; Li J; Du Y; Yu S; Wang M; Wu H; Yue H
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():683733. PubMed ID: 34222005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. SU-E-J-73: Using Surface-Based Imaging for Patient Identification.
Sintay B; Wiant D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part7):3669. PubMed ID: 28519818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of prone versus supine 18F-FDG-PET of locally advanced breast cancer: Phantom and preliminary clinical studies.
Williams JM; Rani SD; Li X; Arlinghaus LR; Lee TC; MacDonald LR; Partridge SC; Kang H; Whisenant JG; Abramson RG; Linden HM; Kinahan PE; Yankeelov TE
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3801-13. PubMed ID: 26133582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative study of set up variations and bowel volumes in supine versus prone positions of patients treated with external beam radiation for carcinoma rectum.
Rajeev KR; Menon SS; Beena K; Holla R; Kumar RR; Dinesh M
J Cancer Res Ther; 2014; 10(4):937-41. PubMed ID: 25579532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of colonic movement between prone and supine patient positions during CT colonography.
Punwani S; Halligan S; Tolan D; Taylor SA; Hawkes D
Br J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 82(978):475-81. PubMed ID: 19124562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Contrast enhanced breast MRI: spatial displacement from prone to supine patient's position. Preliminary results.
Carbonaro LA; Tannaphai P; Trimboli RM; Verardi N; Fedeli MP; Sardanelli F
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jun; 81(6):e771-4. PubMed ID: 22502792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra- and interfractional variations for prone breast irradiation: an indication for image-guided radiotherapy.
Morrow NV; Stepaniak C; White J; Wilson JF; Li XA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Nov; 69(3):910-7. PubMed ID: 17889272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
