These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517642)

  • 1. SU-E-I-62: Investigation of Dominant Factors Affecting Fatigue in Image Reading of Radiologists.
    Ikushima Y; Yabuuchi H; Honda H; Morishita J
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part5):3639. PubMed ID: 28517642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of dominant factors affecting fatigue caused by soft-copy reading.
    Ikushima Y; Yabuuchi H; Morishita J; Honda H
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Nov; 20(11):1448-56. PubMed ID: 24119359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Investigation of the actual conditions of hospital nurses working on three rotating shifts: questionnaire results of shift work schedules, feelings of sleep and fatigue, and depression].
    Matsumoto M; Kamata S; Naoe H; Mutoh F; Chiba S
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 1996; 98(1):11-26. PubMed ID: 8721096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic accuracy and reading time to detect intracranial aneurysms on MR angiography using a computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Kakeda S; Korogi Y; Arimura H; Hirai T; Katsuragawa S; Aoki T; Doi K
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):459-65. PubMed ID: 18212233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Image Size Influences Visual Search and Perception of Hemorrhages When Reading Cranial CT: An Eye-Tracking Study.
    Venjakob AC; Marnitz T; Phillips P; Mello-Thoms CR
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):441-51. PubMed ID: 26936388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Artificial Intelligence for the Analysis of Workload-Related Changes in Radiologists' Gaze Patterns.
    Pershin I; Kholiavchenko M; Maksudov B; Mustafaev T; Ibragimova D; Ibragimov B
    IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2022 Sep; 26(9):4541-4550. PubMed ID: 35704540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of monitor luminance and ambient light on observer performance in soft-copy reading of digital chest radiographs.
    Goo JM; Choi JY; Im JG; Lee HJ; Chung MJ; Han D; Park SH; Kim JH; Nam SH
    Radiology; 2004 Sep; 232(3):762-6. PubMed ID: 15273338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Technology and perception in the 21st-century reading room.
    Krupinski EA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17412098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Application of a computer-aided detection (CAD) system to digitalized mammograms for identifying microcalcifications].
    Bazzocchi M; Facecchia I; Zuiani C; Londero V; Smania S; Bottigli U; Delogu P
    Radiol Med; 2001 May; 101(5):334-40. PubMed ID: 11438784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Object detectability at increased ambient lighting conditions.
    Pollard BJ; Chawla AS; Delong DM; Hashimoto N; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2204-13. PubMed ID: 18649449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long radiology workdays reduce detection and accommodation accuracy.
    Krupinski EA; Berbaum KS; Caldwell RT; Schartz KM; Kim J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2010 Sep; 7(9):698-704. PubMed ID: 20816631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Variation in false-positive rates of mammography reading among 1067 radiologists: a population-based assessment.
    Tan A; Freeman DH; Goodwin JS; Freeman JL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Dec; 100(3):309-18. PubMed ID: 16819566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of different compression techniques on diagnostic accuracies of breast masses on digitized mammograms.
    Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yang Y; Rong D; Yao X; Li K
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Sep; 49(7):747-51. PubMed ID: 18608020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Full-field digital mammographic interpretation with prior analog versus prior digitized analog mammography: time for interpretation.
    Garg AS; Rapelyea JA; Rechtman LR; Torrente J; Bittner RB; Coffey CM; Brem RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jun; 196(6):1436-8. PubMed ID: 21606310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Expanding and contracting optical flow patterns and simulator sickness.
    Bubka A; Bonato F; Palmisano S
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2007 Apr; 78(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 17484340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload.
    McDonald RJ; Schwartz KM; Eckel LJ; Diehn FE; Hunt CH; Bartholmai BJ; Erickson BJ; Kallmes DF
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):1191-8. PubMed ID: 26210525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reading on LCD vs e-Ink displays: effects on fatigue and visual strain.
    Siegenthaler E; Bochud Y; Bergamin P; Wurtz P
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2012 Sep; 32(5):367-74. PubMed ID: 22762257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimal hepatic encephalopathy and critical flicker frequency are associated with survival of patients with cirrhosis.
    Ampuero J; Simón M; Montoliú C; Jover R; Serra MÁ; Córdoba J; Romero-Gómez M
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Nov; 149(6):1483-9. PubMed ID: 26299413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of stereoscopic picture quality with CFF.
    Mitsuhashi T
    Ergonomics; 1996 Nov; 39(11):1344-56. PubMed ID: 8974885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disorientation and postural ataxia following flight simulation.
    Kennedy RS; Berbaum KS; Lilienthal MG
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1997 Jan; 68(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 9006876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.