123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517671)
1. SU-E-I-60: Validation of An Optically Stimulated Luminescent (OSL) Dosimeter for Use in Output Exposure Control Verification of Mammography Imaging Systems.
Ranger R; Butler P; Yahnke C; Valentino D
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part5):3638. PubMed ID: 28517671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors.
Takegami K; Hayashi H; Yamada K; Mihara Y; Kimoto N; Kanazawa Y; Higashino K; Yamashita K; Hayashi F; Okazaki T; Hashizume T; Kobayashi I
Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Mar; 10(1):49-59. PubMed ID: 27341805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of multislice computed tomography dose index (CTDI) using optically stimulated luminescence technology.
Ruan C; Yukihara EG; Clouse WJ; Gasparian PB; Ahmad S
Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3560-8. PubMed ID: 20831063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Measurement of Average Glandular Dose Using Multiparameter X-ray Measuring Instrument].
Kobayashi T; Koyama T; Terada M; Negishi T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2023 Nov; 79(11):1266-1273. PubMed ID: 37778978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose.
Berns EA; Hendrick RE; Cutter GR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):334-40. PubMed ID: 12674233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of identification limit for a small-type OSL dosimeter on the medical images by measurement of X-ray spectra.
Takegami K; Hayashi H; Okino H; Kimoto N; Maehata I; Kanazawa Y; Okazaki T; Hashizume T; Kobayashi I
Radiol Phys Technol; 2016 Jul; 9(2):286-92. PubMed ID: 27260346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization and implementation of OSL dosimeters for use in evaluating the efficacy of organ-based tube current modulation for CT scans of the face and orbits.
Marsh RM; Silosky M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1730-8. PubMed ID: 25832062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Investigation of backscatter factor in medical radiography using anthropomorphic phantom by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter.
Arimoto A; Asada Y
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Sep; 7(6):. PubMed ID: 34438389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Practical calibration curve of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter for evaluation of entrance skin dose in the diagnostic X-ray region.
Takegami K; Hayashi H; Okino H; Kimoto N; Maehata I; Kanazawa Y; Okazaki T; Kobayashi I
Radiol Phys Technol; 2015 Jul; 8(2):286-94. PubMed ID: 25975450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Precision of half-value layer measurement on mammography].
Ishii R; Yoshida A; Ishii M; Fujimoto S; Henmi N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2011; 67(12):1533-9. PubMed ID: 22186198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An estimate of the influence of the measurement procedure on patient and phantom doses in breast imaging.
Avramova-Cholakova S; Vassileva J; Borisova R; Atanasova I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):150-4. PubMed ID: 18426848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Solid-state dosimeters: a new approach for mammography measurements.
Brateman LF; Heintz PH
Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):542-57. PubMed ID: 25652475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterization of a commercially-available, optically-stimulated luminescent dosimetry system for use in computed tomography.
Lavoie L; Ghita M; Brateman L; Arreola M
Health Phys; 2011 Sep; 101(3):299-310. PubMed ID: 21799346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter for measuring patient exposure from imaging guidance procedures.
Ding GX; Malcolm AW
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(17):5885-97. PubMed ID: 23920245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Efficient, Affordable Optically Stimulated Luminescent (OSL) Annealer.
Abraham SA; Frank SJ; Kearfott KJ
Health Phys; 2017 Jul; 113(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 28542006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of an X-Ray Dose Profile Derived from an Optically Stimulated Luminescent Dosimeter during Computed Tomographic Fluoroscopy.
Hasegawa H; Sato M; Tanaka H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132154. PubMed ID: 26151914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The measurement of entrance surface dose using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters for determining average glandular dose in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurement and simulation study.
Chusin T; Yabsantia S; Matsubara K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jan; 23(1):e13485. PubMed ID: 35041264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Getting started with protocol for quality assurance of digital mammography in the clinical centre of Montenegro.
Ivanovic S; Bosmans H; Mijovic S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):363-8. PubMed ID: 25862535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters for application in clinical mammography.
Benevides LA; Hintenlang DE
Med Phys; 2006 Feb; 33(2):514-20. PubMed ID: 16532959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient dose in digital mammography.
Chevalier M; Morán P; Ten JI; Fernández Soto JM; Cepeda T; Vañó E
Med Phys; 2004 Sep; 31(9):2471-9. PubMed ID: 15487727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
