These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517671)

  • 41. Optically stimulated luminescence in vivo dosimetry for radiotherapy: physical characterization and clinical measurements in (60)Co beams.
    Mrčela I; Bokulić T; Izewska J; Budanec M; Fröbe A; Kusić Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(18):6065-82. PubMed ID: 21873767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Feasibility of dosimetric measurements using Al2O3:C OSL dosimeter during fluoroscopy-guided procedures.
    Choi TW; Chung JW; Cha BK; Choi KN; Park S; Son JW; Choi CH
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Nov; 40(4):. PubMed ID: 33027779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range.
    Al-Senan RM; Hatab MR
    Med Phys; 2011 Jul; 38(7):4396-405. PubMed ID: 21859040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. SU-E-T-178: Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Dosimetry: A Study of A-Al2O3:C Assessed by PENELOPE Monte Carlo Simulation.
    Nicolucci P; Schuch F
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3744. PubMed ID: 28517820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of a real-time BeO ceramic fiber-coupled luminescence dosimetry system for dose verification of high dose rate brachytherapy.
    Santos AM; Mohammadi M; Afshar V S
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6349-56. PubMed ID: 26520726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. OSL dosimeters for dental panoramic radiography.
    Gutiérrez-Marquez JG; Avalos-Piña LY; López-Valencia A; Palacios-Pérez LL; Vega-Carrillo HR; Rivera-Montalvo T
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2018 Dec; 142():32-37. PubMed ID: 30248586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
    Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of Commercially Available Optically Stimulated Luminescence Dosimeter As Extremity Dose Estimator.
    Georgeson DL; Christiansen BH
    Health Phys; 2021 Jan; 120(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 32384374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dose reduction in automatic optimization parameter of full field digital mammography: breast phantom study.
    Ko MS; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Kim JH; Kim MJ
    J Breast Cancer; 2013 Mar; 16(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23593088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Radiation exposure of digital breast tomosynthesis using an antiscatter grid compared with full-field digital mammography.
    Paulis LE; Lobbes MB; Lalji UC; Gelissen N; Bouwman RW; Wildberger JE; Jeukens CR
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Oct; 50(10):679-85. PubMed ID: 26011823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography.
    Koutalonis M; Delis H; Spyrou G; Costaridou L; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5539-48. PubMed ID: 17047268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A survey on performance status of mammography machines: image quality and dosimetry studies using a standard mammography imaging phantom.
    Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Jul; 150(3):325-33. PubMed ID: 22090414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of full field digital (FFD) and computed radiography (CR) mammography systems in Greece.
    Kalathaki M; Hourdakis CJ; Economides S; Tritakis P; Kalyvas N; Simantirakis G; Manousaridis G; Kaisas I; Kamenopoulou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21821614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Relationship between detector size and the need for extra images and their effect on radiation exposure in digital mammography screening.
    Entz K; Sommer A; Heindel W; Lenzen H
    Rofo; 2014 Sep; 186(9):868-75. PubMed ID: 24563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Development of a personal dosimetry system based on optically stimulated luminescence of alpha-Al2O3:C for mixed radiation fields.
    Lee SY; Lee KJ
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2001 Apr; 54(4):675-85. PubMed ID: 11225704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Mailed thermoluminescent dosimeter determination of entrance skin exposure and half-value layer in mammography.
    Wochos JF; Fullerton GD; DeWerd LA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Oct; 131(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 102151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Average glandular dose in digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis.
    Olgar T; Kahn T; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):911-8. PubMed ID: 22711250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of Doses and Image Quality in Mammography with Screen-Film, CR, and DR Detectors - Application of the ACR Phantom.
    Ślusarczyk-Kacprzyk W; Skrzyński W; Fabiszewska E
    Pol J Radiol; 2016; 81():386-91. PubMed ID: 27617048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
    Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Application of the optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) technique for mouse dosimetry in micro-CT imaging.
    Vrigneaud JM; Courteau A; Ranouil J; Morgand L; Raguin O; Walker P; Oudot A; Collin B; Brunotte F
    Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):122102. PubMed ID: 24320529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.