These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28517837)

  • 1. SU-E-T-188: Evaluation of a 3D Patient Relevant Dose QA Tool: Multiple Institutional Studies.
    Shiu A; Chan M; Chung H; Wang H; Yan D; Yang K; Li X; Chang Y; Bai S; Qi Z; Deng X
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3746. PubMed ID: 28517837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
    Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification.
    Infusino E; Mameli A; Conti R; Gaudino D; Stimato G; Bellesi L; D'Angelillo RM; Ramella S; Benassi M; Trodella L
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 25088815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.
    Stasi M; Bresciani S; Miranti A; Maggio A; Sapino V; Gabriele P
    Med Phys; 2012 Dec; 39(12):7626-34. PubMed ID: 23231310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using a novel dose QA tool to quantify the impact of systematic errors otherwise undetected by conventional QA methods: clinical head and neck case studies.
    Chan MF; Li J; Schupak K; Burman C
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Feb; 13(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 23819494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.
    Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
    Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SU-E-T-601: Dosimetric Evaluation of the Parameter Variation with Varying Calculation Grid Size in the IMRT Cases.
    Markovic M; Stathakis S; Mavroidis P; Gutierrez A; Esquivel C; Papanikolau N
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part19):3844. PubMed ID: 28517093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SU-E-T-200: IMRT Patient Specific QA for On-Line Adaptive Radiotherapy.
    Gao Z; Wong J; Merrick S; Karim M; Li M
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3749. PubMed ID: 28517841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.
    Zhen H; Nelms BE; Tome WA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5477-89. PubMed ID: 21992366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SU-E-T-384: An Easy Use Anthropomorphic Phantom for Lung IMRT QA.
    Fan E; Ellerbusch D; Qin L
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part16):3792. PubMed ID: 28517184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dosimetric evaluation of MapCHECK 2 and 3DVH in the IMRT delivery quality assurance process.
    Song JY; Kim YH; Jeong JU; Yoon MS; Ahn SJ; Chung WK; Nam TK
    Med Dosim; 2014; 39(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 24332483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SU-E-T-164: Clinical Implementation of ASi EPID Panels for QA of IMRT/VMAT Plans.
    Hosier K; Wu C; Beck K; Radevic M; Asche D; Bareng J; Kroner A; Lehmann J; Logsdon M; Dutton S; Rosenthal S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3740-3741. PubMed ID: 28517813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT-VMAT delivery using the EPID.
    McCowan PM; Van Uytven E; Van Beek T; Asuni G; McCurdy BM
    Med Phys; 2015 Dec; 42(12):6955-63. PubMed ID: 26632051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. SU-E-T-203: Development of a QA Software Tool for Automatic Verification of Plan Data Transfer and Delivery.
    Chen G; Li X
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3750. PubMed ID: 28517800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of a software system for estimating planned dose error in patients, based on planar IMRT QA measurements.
    Bakhtiari M; Parniani A; Lerma F; Reynolds S; Jordan J; Sedaghat A; Sarfaraz M; Rodgers J
    Radiol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 48(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 24587785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. SU-E-J-14: Evaluation of Mechanical Accuracy of Electronic Portal Imaging Devise on Its Use in Patient Specific IMRT QA.
    Li J; Burman C; Chan M
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part6):3655. PubMed ID: 28517581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ICRU reference dose in an era of intensity-modulated radiation therapy clinical trials: correlation with planning target volume mean dose and suitability for intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose prescription.
    Yaparpalvi R; Hong L; Mah D; Shen J; Mutyala S; Spierer M; Garg M; Guha C; Kalnicki S
    Radiother Oncol; 2008 Dec; 89(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 18762345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. IMRT QA: Selecting gamma criteria based on error detection sensitivity.
    Steers JM; Fraass BA
    Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1982. PubMed ID: 27036593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of protocol target definition on the ability to spare normal tissue: an IMRT and 3D-CRT planning comparison for intraorbital tumors.
    Hein PA; Gladstone DJ; Bellerive MR; Hug EB
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Aug; 62(5):1540-8. PubMed ID: 16029816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.