BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28518187)

  • 1. In Vitro Shock Absorption Tests on Implant-Supported Crowns: Influence of Crown Materials and Luting Agents.
    Rosentritt M; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M; Preis V
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(1):116–122. PubMed ID: 28518187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro damping and strain distribution for implant-supported crowns using 5 different CAD-CAM crowns and 3 different luting cements.
    Sukkasam C; Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 May; 131(5):916.e1-916.e9. PubMed ID: 38443240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro evaluation of material dependent force damping behavior of implant-supported restorations using different CAD-CAM materials and luting conditions.
    Taha D; Sabet A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jul; 126(1):93.e1-93.e9. PubMed ID: 33933269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fracture Strength of Monolithic All-Ceramic Crowns on Titanium Implant Abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(2):304-9. PubMed ID: 27004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
    Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.
    Garg P; Pujari M; Prithviraj DR; Khare S
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):649-54. PubMed ID: 25506659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of implant-supported zirconium oxide ceramic restorations using different luting agents.
    Nejatidanesh F; Savabi O; Shahtoosi M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():20-4. PubMed ID: 22092303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retentive strength of monolithic all-ceramic crowns on implant abutments.
    Weyhrauch M; Igiel C; Wentaschek S; Pabst AM; Scheller H; Weibrich G; Lehmann KM
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(2):135-44. PubMed ID: 25098161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of margin location and luting material on the amount of undetected cement excess on CAD/CAM implant abutments and cement-retained zirconia crowns: an in-vitro study.
    Gehrke P; Bleuel K; Fischer C; Sader R
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):111. PubMed ID: 31200680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture load of implant-supported zirconia all-ceramic crowns luted with various cements.
    Lim HP; Yoo JM; Park SW; Yang HS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 20617227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
    Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns.
    Covey DA; Kent DK; St Germain HA; Koka S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Mar; 83(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 10709044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the amount of excess cement around the margins of cement-retained dental implant restorations: the effect of the cement application method.
    Chee WW; Duncan J; Afshar M; Moshaverinia A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 23566601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
    Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adhesive Cementation Promotes Higher Fatigue Resistance to Zirconia Crowns.
    Campos F; Valandro LF; Feitosa SA; Kleverlaan CJ; Feilzer AJ; de Jager N; Bottino MA
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):215-224. PubMed ID: 27892840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simplified cementation of lithium disilicate crowns: Retention with various adhesive resin cement combinations.
    Johnson GH; Lepe X; Patterson A; Schäfer O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 May; 119(5):826-832. PubMed ID: 28967395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention of cast crown copings cemented to implant abutments.
    Dudley JE; Richards LC; Abbott JR
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Dec; 53(4):332-9. PubMed ID: 19133949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of cement film thickness on the retention of implant-retained crowns.
    Mehl C; Harder S; Steiner M; Vollrath O; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Dec; 22(8):618-25. PubMed ID: 23915027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.