84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28518510)
1. SU-E-T-541: Dose Calculation Algorithm for External Neutron Radiotherapy Based on Pencil Beam Method.
Moiseev A; Klimanov V
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part18):3830. PubMed ID: 28518510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pencil beam kernel-based dose calculations on CT data for a mixed neutron-gamma fission field applying tissue correction factors.
Sommer LB; Kampfer S; Chemnitz T; Breitkreutz H; Combs SE; Wilkens JJ
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Feb; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 38241727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
Ali I; Ahmad S
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new concept of pencil beam dose calculation for 40-200 keV photons using analytical dose kernels.
Bartzsch S; Oelfke U
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111714. PubMed ID: 24320422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A pencil beam algorithm for helium ion beam therapy.
Fuchs H; Strobele J; Schreiner T; Hirtl A; Georg D
Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6726-37. PubMed ID: 23127066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose verification of an IMRT treatment planning system with the BEAM EGS4-based Monte Carlo code.
Francescon P; Cora S; Chiovati P
Med Phys; 2003 Feb; 30(2):144-57. PubMed ID: 12607832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Empirical description and Monte Carlo simulation of fast neutron pencil beams as basis of a treatment planning system.
Bourhis-Martin E; Meissner P; Rassow J; Baumhoer W; Schmidt R; Sauerwein W
Med Phys; 2002 Aug; 29(8):1670-7. PubMed ID: 12201412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. SU-E-T-486: Volume and Location Dependence on the Difference Between Monte Carlo and Pencil Beam Dose Calculations for Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.
Zhuang T; Djemil T; Qi P; Magnelli A; Stephans K; Videtic G; Xia P
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3817. PubMed ID: 28517485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of patient dose calculation for lung IMRT: A comparison of Monte Carlo, convolution/superposition, and pencil beam computations.
Vanderstraeten B; Reynaert N; Paelinck L; Madani I; De Wagter C; De Gersem W; De Neve W; Thierens H
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3149-58. PubMed ID: 17022207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo- versus pencil-beam-/collapsed-cone-dose calculation in a heterogeneous multi-layer phantom.
Krieger T; Sauer OA
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(5):859-68. PubMed ID: 15798260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reducing dose calculation time for accurate iterative IMRT planning.
Siebers JV; Lauterbach M; Tong S; Wu Q; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2002 Feb; 29(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 11865994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity modulated dose calculation with an improved experimental pencil-beam kernel.
Azcona JD; Burguete J
Med Phys; 2010 Sep; 37(9):4634-42. PubMed ID: 20964182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Verification measurements and clinical evaluation of the iPlan RT Monte Carlo dose algorithm for 6 MV photon energy.
Petoukhova AL; van Wingerden K; Wiggenraad RG; van de Vaart PJ; van Egmond J; Franken EM; van Santvoort JP
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4601-14. PubMed ID: 20668337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A pencil beam model for photon dose calculation.
Ahnesjö A; Saxner M; Trepp A
Med Phys; 1992; 19(2):263-73. PubMed ID: 1584117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modelling lateral beam quality variations in pencil kernel based photon dose calculations.
Nyholm T; Olofsson J; Ahnesjö A; Karlsson M
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 51(16):4111-8. PubMed ID: 16885628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of electron beam dose calculation accuracy between treatment planning systems using either a pencil beam or a Monte Carlo algorithm.
Ding GX; Cygler JE; Yu CW; Kalach NI; Daskalov G
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):622-33. PubMed ID: 16168854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SU-E-T-495: Monte Carlo Dose Verification of Passive Scattering Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer.
Giantsoudi D; Paganetti H
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part17):3819. PubMed ID: 28517455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of dose planning calculations for boron neutron capture therapy using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
Koivunoro H; Seppälä T; Uusi-Simola J; Merimaa K; Kotiluoto P; Serén T; Kortesniemi M; Auterinen I; Savolainen S
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jun; 55(12):3515-33. PubMed ID: 20508317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams.
Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D
Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
