95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28518685)
1. TU-E-217BCD-08: Extraction and Insertion of Tumor Masses in Cone Beam Breast CT Images.
Lai C; Shen Y; Zhong Y; Whitman G; Yang W; Wang T; Shaw C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3915. PubMed ID: 28518685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A general method for cupping artifact correction of cone-beam breast computed tomography images.
Qu X; Lai CJ; Zhong Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jul; 11(7):1233-46. PubMed ID: 26514684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography.
Zhao B; Zhang X; Cai W; Conover D; Ning R
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25439008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TU-E-217BCD-06: Cone Beam Breast CT with a High Resolution Flat Panel Detector-Improvement of Calcification Visibility.
Shen Y; Zhong Y; Lai C; Wang T; Shaw C
Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part24):3915. PubMed ID: 28518682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.
Tavakoli Taba S; Baran P; Nesterets YI; Pacile S; Wienbeck S; Dullin C; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Lockie D; Mayo SC; Quiney HM; Dreossi D; Arfelli F; Tromba G; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 31974689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT using a forward-projection model.
Shi L; Vedantham S; Karellas A; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2017 Jun; 44(6):2312-2320. PubMed ID: 28295375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cone Beam Breast CT noise reduction using 3D adaptive Gaussian filtering.
Zhang X; Ning R; Yang D
J Xray Sci Technol; 2009; 17(4):319-33. PubMed ID: 19923688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Review of clinical studies and first clinical experiences with a commercially available cone-beam breast CT in Europe.
Wienbeck S; Lotz J; Fischer U
Clin Imaging; 2017; 42():50-59. PubMed ID: 27875762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Sparse-view Cone-beam Breast CT Reconstruction via cGAN Constrained by Image Edges].
Yang Y; Fang C; Zhu L
Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2022 Mar; 46(2):119-125. PubMed ID: 35411734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative breast density measurement based on three-dimensional images: a study on cone-beam breast computed tomography.
Liu A; Yin L; Ma Y; Han P; Wu Y; Wu Y; Ye Z
Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1023-1031. PubMed ID: 34259021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of the diagnostic efficiency in breast malignancy between cone beam breast CT and mammography in dense breast].
Liu AD; Ma Y; Yin L; Han P; Li HJ; Ye ZX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2018 Aug; 40(8):604-609. PubMed ID: 30139031
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The role of off-focus radiation in scatter correction for dedicated cone beam breast CT.
Shi L; Vedantham S; Karellas A; Zhu L
Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):191-201. PubMed ID: 29159941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.
Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Luftner-Nagel S; Zapf A; Surov A; von Fintel E; Stahnke V; Lotz J; Fischer U
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5185-5195. PubMed ID: 28677053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Artifacts Caused by Breast Tissue Markers in a Dedicated Cone-beam Breast CT in Comparison to Full-field Digital Mammography.
Wienbeck S; Nowak C; Zapf A; Stamm G; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Lotz J; Fischer U
Acad Radiol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):908-915. PubMed ID: 28130048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dedicated Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Mammography: Comparison of Radiation Dose, Patient Comfort, And Qualitative Review of Imaging Findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions.
O'Connell AM; Kawakyu-O'Connor D
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():7. PubMed ID: 22439131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reference Range of CT Value in NC-CBBCT Based on Female Breast Structure.
Wei W; Zhong W; Kang W; Zhao X; Yi X; Su D
Curr Med Imaging; 2023; 19(13):1523-1532. PubMed ID: 36734890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A post-reconstruction method to correct cupping artifacts in cone beam breast computed tomography.
Altunbas MC; Shaw CC; Chen L; Lai C; Liu X; Han T; Wang T
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3109-18. PubMed ID: 17822018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
