These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28518689)

  • 21. Optimization of x-ray spectra in digital mammography through Monte Carlo simulations.
    Cunha DM; Tomal A; Poletti ME
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 57(7):1919-35. PubMed ID: 22421418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bowtie filters for dedicated breast CT: Analysis of bowtie filter material selection.
    Kontson K; Jennings RJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5270-7. PubMed ID: 26328976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Investigation of the dose distribution for a cone beam CT system dedicated to breast imaging.
    Lanconelli N; Mettivier G; Lo Meo S; Russo P
    Phys Med; 2013 Jun; 29(4):379-87. PubMed ID: 22763280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Image quality comparison between single energy and dual energy CT protocols for hepatic imaging.
    Yao Y; Ng JM; Megibow AJ; Pelc NJ
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4877. PubMed ID: 27487905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of X-ray tube parameters, iodine concentration, and patient size on image quality in pulmonary computed tomography angiography: a chest-phantom-study.
    Szucs-Farkas Z; Verdun FR; von Allmen G; Mini RL; Vock P
    Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):374-81. PubMed ID: 18496042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Potential of high-Z contrast agents in clinical contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Nowak T; Hupfer M; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6469-82. PubMed ID: 22149830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Patient size and x-ray technique factors in head computed tomography examinations. II. Image quality.
    Huda W; Lieberman KA; Chang J; Roskopf ML
    Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 15070259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
    Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
    Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spectral optimization for measuring electron density by the dual-energy computed tomography coupled with balanced filter method.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2009 Aug; 36(8):3631-42. PubMed ID: 19746797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A rapid noninvasive characterization of CT x-ray sources.
    Randazzo M; Tambasco M
    Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3960-8. PubMed ID: 26133596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technical note: optimization for improved tube-loading efficiency in the dual-energy computed tomography coupled with balanced filter method.
    Saito M
    Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4182-5. PubMed ID: 20879578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Radiation dose and image quality in pediatric CT: effect of technical factors and phantom size and shape.
    Siegel MJ; Schmidt B; Bradley D; Suess C; Hildebolt C
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):515-22. PubMed ID: 15358847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The upper limits of the SNR in radiography and CT with polyenergetic x-rays.
    Shikhaliev PM
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Sep; 55(18):5317-39. PubMed ID: 20736493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Thickness of molybdenum filter and squared contrast-to-noise ratio per dose for digital mammography.
    Nishino TK; Wu X; Johnson RF
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Oct; 185(4):960-3. PubMed ID: 16177415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrast-to-noise ratios of different elements in digital mammography: evaluation of their potential as new contrast agents.
    Diekmann F; Sommer A; Lawaczeck R; Diekmann S; Pietsch H; Speck U; Hamm B; Bick U
    Invest Radiol; 2007 May; 42(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 17414528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Technique factors and image quality as functions of patient weight at abdominal CT.
    Huda W; Scalzetti EM; Levin G
    Radiology; 2000 Nov; 217(2):430-5. PubMed ID: 11058640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter.
    Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2001 Feb; 28(2):220-31. PubMed ID: 11243347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.