These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28519483)

  • 1. SU-E-I-56: Threshold Effect of ASIR Before Which Image Improve and After Which Image Degrades.
    Abdulkhaliq F; Mail N; Saoudi A
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part4):3637. PubMed ID: 28519483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
    Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technical Note: Evaluation of a 160-mm/256-row CT scanner for whole-heart quantitative myocardial perfusion imaging.
    So A; Imai Y; Nett B; Jackson J; Nett L; Hsieh J; Wisenberg G; Teefy P; Yadegari A; Islam A; Lee TY
    Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4821. PubMed ID: 27487900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of the dose reduction potential of a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm using a task-based performance metrology.
    Samei E; Richard S
    Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):314-23. PubMed ID: 25563271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of model-based iterative reconstruction on image quality for low-dose computed tomographic angiography of the thoracic aorta in a Swine model.
    Caywood D; Paxton B; Boll D; Nelson R; Kim C; Lowry C; Seaman D; Roos JE; Hurwitz LM
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 25474144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reducing the radiation dose with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for chest CT in adults: a parameter study.
    Liu W; Ding X; Kong B; Fan B; Chen L
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2014; 127(7):1284-8. PubMed ID: 24709181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.
    Baker ME; Dong F; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Einstein D; Gandhi N; Herts BR; Purysko A; Remer E; Vachhani N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 22733888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses.
    Yoon MA; Kim SH; Lee JM; Woo HS; Lee ES; Ahn SJ; Han JK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 22992612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
    Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Low-tube-voltage, high-tube-current multidetector abdominal CT: improved image quality and decreased radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm--initial clinical experience.
    Marin D; Nelson RC; Schindera ST; Richard S; Youngblood RS; Yoshizumi TT; Samei E
    Radiology; 2010 Jan; 254(1):145-53. PubMed ID: 20032149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
    Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of a computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithm by image quality evaluations with an anthropomorphic phantom.
    Rampado O; Bossi L; Garabello D; Davini O; Ropolo R
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3172-7. PubMed ID: 22817847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
    Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Hsieh J; Licato PE; Do S; Pien HH; Blake MA
    Radiology; 2010 Nov; 257(2):373-83. PubMed ID: 20829535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.