These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28520895)

  • 1. Distribution patterns of Saccharomyces species in cultural landscapes of Germany.
    Brysch-Herzberg M; Seidel M
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2017 Aug; 17(5):. PubMed ID: 28520895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persistence of Resident and Transplanted Genotypes of the Undomesticated Yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus in Forest Soil.
    Anderson JB; Kasimer D; Xia W; Schröder NCH; Cichowicz P; Lioniello S; Chakrabarti R; Mohan E; Kohn LM
    mSphere; 2018 Jun; 3(3):. PubMed ID: 29925673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics.
    Sniegowski PD; Dombrowski PG; Fingerman E
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2002 Jan; 1(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 12702333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the northern limit of the distribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus in North America.
    Charron G; Leducq JB; Bertin C; Dubé AK; Landry CR
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2014 Mar; 14(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 24119009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in the Relative Abundance of Two Saccharomyces Species from Oak Forests to Wine Fermentations.
    Dashko S; Liu P; Volk H; Butinar L; Piškur J; Fay JC
    Front Microbiol; 2016; 7():215. PubMed ID: 26941733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic homology between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its sibling species S. paradoxus and S. bayanus: electrophoretic karyotypes.
    Naumov GI; Naumova ES; Lantto RA; Louis EJ; Korhola M
    Yeast; 1992 Aug; 8(8):599-612. PubMed ID: 1441740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks.
    Naumov GI; Naumova ES; Sniegowski PD
    Can J Microbiol; 1998 Nov; 44(11):1045-50. PubMed ID: 10029999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the efficiency and biases of forest Saccharomyces sampling strategies.
    Boynton PJ; Kowallik V; Landermann D; Stukenbrock EH
    Yeast; 2019 Nov; 36(11):657-668. PubMed ID: 31348543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus.
    Sampaio JP; Gonçalves P
    Appl Environ Microbiol; 2008 Apr; 74(7):2144-52. PubMed ID: 18281431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interaction of Saccharomyces paradoxus with its natural competitors on oak bark.
    Kowallik V; Miller E; Greig D
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Apr; 24(7):1596-610. PubMed ID: 25706044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enological characterization of Spanish Saccharomyces kudriavzevii strains, one of the closest relatives to parental strains of winemaking and brewing Saccharomyces cerevisiae × S. kudriavzevii hybrids.
    Peris D; Pérez-Través L; Belloch C; Querol A
    Food Microbiol; 2016 Feb; 53(Pt B):31-40. PubMed ID: 26678127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogenetic analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae group based on polymorphisms of rDNA spacer sequences.
    Montrocher R; Verner MC; Briolay J; Gautier C; Marmeisse R
    Int J Syst Bacteriol; 1998 Jan; 48 Pt 1():295-303. PubMed ID: 9542100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The [URE3] prion is not conserved among Saccharomyces species.
    Talarek N; Maillet L; Cullin C; Aigle M
    Genetics; 2005 Sep; 171(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 15956663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A systematic forest survey showing an association of Saccharomyces paradoxus with oak leaf litter.
    Kowallik V; Greig D
    Environ Microbiol Rep; 2016 Oct; 8(5):833-841. PubMed ID: 27481438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization of natural hybrids of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum.
    Le Jeune C; Lollier M; Demuyter C; Erny C; Legras JL; Aigle M; Masneuf-Pomarède I
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2007 Jun; 7(4):540-9. PubMed ID: 17302940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A PCR-TGGE (Temperature Gradient Gel Electrophoresis) technique to assess differentiation among enological Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains.
    Manzano M; Cocolin L; Iacumin L; Cantoni C; Comi G
    Int J Food Microbiol; 2005 Jun; 101(3):333-9. PubMed ID: 15925714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a nomadic yeast with no niche?
    Goddard MR; Greig D
    FEMS Yeast Res; 2015 May; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 25725024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative evaluation of some oenological properties in wine strains of Candida stellata, Candida zemplinina, Saccharomyces uvarum and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Magyar I; Tóth T
    Food Microbiol; 2011 Feb; 28(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 21056780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Summer temperature can predict the distribution of wild yeast populations.
    Robinson HA; Pinharanda A; Bensasson D
    Ecol Evol; 2016 Feb; 6(4):1236-50. PubMed ID: 26941949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PCR-DGGE differentiation of strains of Saccharomyces sensu stricto.
    Manzano M; Cocolin L; Longo B; Comi G
    Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek; 2004 Jan; 85(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 15031660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.