These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28522307)
1. Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory to understand healthy and unhealthy eating intentions and behaviour. Evans R; Norman P; Webb TL Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():357-364. PubMed ID: 28522307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Personal and situational predictors of everyday snacking: An application of temporal self-regulation theory. Elliston KG; Ferguson SG; Schüz B Br J Health Psychol; 2017 Nov; 22(4):854-871. PubMed ID: 28722217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting what mothers feed their preschoolers: Guided by an extended theory of planned behaviour. McKee M; Mullan B; Mergelsberg E; Gardner B; Hamilton K; Slabbert A; Kothe E Appetite; 2019 Jun; 137():250-258. PubMed ID: 30872144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The habitual nature of unhealthy snacking: How powerful are habits in adolescence? De Vet E; Stok FM; De Wit JB; De Ridder DT Appetite; 2015 Dec; 95():182-7. PubMed ID: 26169248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predicting healthy eating intention and adherence to dietary recommendations during pregnancy in Australia using the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Malek L; Umberger WJ; Makrides M; ShaoJia Z Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():431-441. PubMed ID: 28536056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting fruit and vegetable consumption in long-haul heavy goods vehicle drivers: Application of a multi-theory, dual-phase model and the contribution of past behaviour. Brown DJ; Hagger MS; Morrissey S; Hamilton K Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():326-336. PubMed ID: 29191744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of Compensatory Health Beliefs in eating behavior change: A mixed method study. Amrein MA; Rackow P; Inauen J; Radtke T; Scholz U Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():1-10. PubMed ID: 28433774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The interplay of intention, autonomy, and sex with dietary planning: A conditional process model to predict fruit and vegetable intake. Lange D; Corbett J; Lippke S; Knoll N; Schwarzer R Br J Health Psychol; 2015 Nov; 20(4):859-76. PubMed ID: 26177707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of self-identity in predicting fruit and vegetable intake. Carfora V; Caso D; Conner M Appetite; 2016 Nov; 106():23-9. PubMed ID: 26723237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Developmental trends in eating self-regulation and dietary intake in adolescents. Tăut D; Băban A; Giese H; de Matos MG; Schupp H; Renner B Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2015 Mar; 7(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 25294778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Identifying the 'if' for 'if-then' plans: combining implementation intentions with cue-monitoring targeting unhealthy snacking behaviour. Verhoeven AA; Adriaanse MA; de Vet E; Fennis BM; de Ridder DT Psychol Health; 2014; 29(12):1476-92. PubMed ID: 25099386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Brief report: Compensatory health beliefs are negatively associated with intentions for regular fruit and vegetable consumption when self-efficacy is low. Storm V; Reinwand D; Wienert J; Kuhlmann T; De Vries H; Lippke S J Health Psychol; 2017 Jul; 22(8):1094-1100. PubMed ID: 26826167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Impact of Autonomy-Framed and Control-Framed Implementation Intentions on Snacking Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Eating Self-Efficacy. Churchill S; Pavey L; Sparks P Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Mar; 11(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 30302915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do habits always override intentions? Pitting unhealthy snacking habits against snack-avoidance intentions. Gardner B; Corbridge S; McGowan L BMC Psychol; 2015; 3(1):8. PubMed ID: 25870763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trait Self-Control, Social Cognition Constructs, and Intentions: Correlational Evidence for Mediation and Moderation Effects in Diverse Health Behaviours. Hagger MS; Hankonen N; Kangro EM; Lintunen T; Pagaduan J; Polet J; Ries F; Hamilton K Appl Psychol Health Well Being; 2019 Nov; 11(3):407-437. PubMed ID: 30724028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From perceived autonomy support to intentional behaviour: Testing an integrated model in three healthy-eating behaviours. Girelli L; Hagger M; Mallia L; Lucidi F Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():280-292. PubMed ID: 26423363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding fruit and vegetable consumption in children and adolescents. The contributions of affect, self-concept and habit strength. Albani V; Butler LT; Traill WB; Kennedy OB Appetite; 2018 Jan; 120():398-408. PubMed ID: 28958902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring temporal self-regulation theory to predict sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Moran A; Mullan B Psychol Health; 2021 Mar; 36(3):334-350. PubMed ID: 32490692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of preparatory and action planning instructions on situation-specific and general fruit and snack intake. de Bruijn GJ; Nguyen MH; Rhodes RE; van Osch L Appetite; 2017 Jan; 108():161-170. PubMed ID: 27671975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When planning is not enough: the self-regulatory effect of implementation intentions on changing snacking habits. Tam L; Bagozzi RP; Spanjol J Health Psychol; 2010 May; 29(3):284-292. PubMed ID: 20496982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]