BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28522475)

  • 1. Paolo Macchiarini's academic afterlife in Russia ends.
    Astakhova A
    Science; 2017 May; 356(6339):672-673. PubMed ID: 28522475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Researchers frustrated by Italian misconduct probe.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7652):13-14. PubMed ID: 28470221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ethical perspectives and ramifications of the Paolo Macchiarini case.
    Teixeira da Silva JA
    Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(4):270-275. PubMed ID: 28343147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surgeon commits misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7553):406-7. PubMed ID: 26017424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retracted paper rattles Korean science.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2009 Apr; 458(7238):561. PubMed ID: 19340046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Restoring confidence in research integrity.
    Lancet Oncol; 2015 Aug; 16(8):871. PubMed ID: 26248829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. China's clampdown on fake-paper factories picks up speed.
    Else H
    Nature; 2021 Oct; 598(7879):19-20. PubMed ID: 34594025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further accusations rock Japanese RNA laboratory.
    Fuyuno I
    Nature; 2006 Apr; 440(7085):720-1. PubMed ID: 16598217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scandal-weary Swedish government takes over research-fraud investigations.
    Else H
    Nature; 2019 Jul; 571(7764):158. PubMed ID: 31289404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
    Wada M
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An unwelcome discovery. Walter DeNino was a young lab technician who analyzed data for his mentor, Eric Poehlman. What he found was that Poehlman was not the scientist he appeared to be.
    Interlandi J
    N Y Times Mag; 2006 Oct; ():98-103. PubMed ID: 17115505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Managing research misconduct: is anyone getting it right?
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2011 Dec; 343():d8212. PubMed ID: 22207043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Publish or perish in China.
    Qiu J
    Nature; 2010 Jan; 463(7278):142-3. PubMed ID: 20075887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ramipril research papers are retracted over faked data.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2015 Sep; 351():h5035. PubMed ID: 26391363
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Highly cited researcher banned from journal board for citation abuse.
    Van Noorden R
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7794):200-201. PubMed ID: 32047304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The science of retraction.
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Dec; 5(12):1249. PubMed ID: 12447375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Institutional research and biomedical journals: Poor quality articles and honest researchers!
    Maisonneuve H; Slim K
    J Visc Surg; 2015 Nov; 152(5):275-8. PubMed ID: 26476677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Scientific integrity and research: towards relearning to prevent unintentional scientific misconduct?].
    Larigot L
    Med Sci (Paris); 2019; 35(8-9):693-696. PubMed ID: 31532383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Cost of Scientific Misconduct.
    Tarazi C
    Pediatr Res; 2015 Nov; 78(5):482. PubMed ID: 26263444
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.