294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28524243)
1. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):303-309. PubMed ID: 28524243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Dent; 2016 Aug; 51():29-35. PubMed ID: 27238052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2014 Sep; 30(9):e245-51. PubMed ID: 24958689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized 3-year clinical evaluation of Class I and II posterior resin restorations placed with a bulk-fill resin composite and a one-step self-etching adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Feb; 17(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 25625133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jul; 19(6):1371-9. PubMed ID: 25359327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-year clinical evaluation of class II posterior composite restorations placed with different techniques and flowable composite linings in endodontically treated teeth.
Karaman E; Keskin B; Inan U
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):709-716. PubMed ID: 27538739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled evaluation of posterior resin restorations of an altered resin modified glass-ionomer cement with claimed bioactivity.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U; Benetti A
Dent Mater; 2019 Feb; 35(2):335-343. PubMed ID: 30527586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Durability of a low shrinkage TEGDMA/HEMA-free resin composite system in Class II restorations. A 6-year follow up.
van Dijken JWV; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):944-953. PubMed ID: 28545657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT.
Heck K; Manhart J; Hickel R; Diegritz C
Dent Mater; 2018 Jun; 34(6):e138-e147. PubMed ID: 29636239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up.
van Dijken JW
J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-year clinical evaluation of different restorative resins in class I restorations.
Yazici AR; Ustunkol I; Ozgunaltay G; Dayangac B
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 24754716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized controlled 30 years follow up of three conventional resin composites in Class II restorations.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2015 Oct; 31(10):1232-44. PubMed ID: 26321155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A 6-year prospective evaluation of a one-step HEMA-free self-etching adhesive in Class II restorations.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):1116-22. PubMed ID: 24011496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities.
Demirci M; Tuncer S; Sancakli HS; Tekçe N; Baydemir C
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(3):261-271. PubMed ID: 29533716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical Evaluation of Sonic-Activated High Viscosity Bulk-Fill Nanohybrid Resin Composite Restorations in Class II Cavities: A Prospective Clinical Study up to 2 Years.
Akalιn TT; Bozkurt FO; Kusdemir M; Özsoy A; Özcan M
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2018 Aug; 26(3):152-160. PubMed ID: 30063305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of the posterior composite QuiXfil in class I and II cavities.
Manhart J; Chen HY; Hickel R
Clin Oral Investig; 2009 Sep; 13(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 18998173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Thirty-Six-Month Clinical Comparison of Bulk Fill and Nanofill Composite Restorations.
Yazici AR; Antonson SA; Kutuk ZB; Ergin E
Oper Dent; 2017; 42(5):478-485. PubMed ID: 28581919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
