These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28525350)

  • 1. Comparing Four Methods for Estimating Tree-Based Treatment Regimes.
    Sies A; Van Mechelen I
    Int J Biostat; 2017 May; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 28525350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimating the quality of optimal treatment regimes.
    Sies A; Van Mechelen I
    Stat Med; 2019 Nov; 38(25):4925-4938. PubMed ID: 31424128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic regime marginal structural mean models for estimation of optimal dynamic treatment regimes, Part I: main content.
    Orellana L; Rotnitzky A; Robins JM
    Int J Biostat; 2010; 6(2):Article 8. PubMed ID: 21969994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reader reaction to "a robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes" by Zhang et al. (2012).
    Taylor JMG; Cheng W; Foster JC
    Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):267-273. PubMed ID: 25228049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using decision lists to construct interpretable and parsimonious treatment regimes.
    Zhang Y; Laber EB; Tsiatis A; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2015 Dec; 71(4):895-904. PubMed ID: 26193819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A robust method for estimating optimal treatment regimes.
    Zhang B; Tsiatis AA; Laber EB; Davidian M
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 22550953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Penalized Spline-Involved Tree-based (PenSIT) Learning for estimating an optimal dynamic treatment regime using observational data.
    Speth KA; Elliott MR; Marquez JL; Wang L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2022 Dec; 31(12):2338-2351. PubMed ID: 36189475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimal treatment regimes for survival endpoints using a locally-efficient doubly-robust estimator from a classification perspective.
    Bai X; Tsiatis AA; Lu W; Song R
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Oct; 23(4):585-604. PubMed ID: 27480339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A modified classification tree method for personalized medicine decisions.
    Tsai WM; Zhang H; Buta E; O'Malley S; Gueorguieva R
    Stat Interface; 2016; 9(2):239-253. PubMed ID: 26770292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Qualitative interaction trees: a tool to identify qualitative treatment-subgroup interactions.
    Dusseldorp E; Van Mechelen I
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(2):219-37. PubMed ID: 23922224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes.
    Laber EB; Zhao YQ
    Biometrika; 2015; 102(3):501-514. PubMed ID: 26893526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Q- and A-learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.
    Schulte PJ; Tsiatis AA; Laber EB; Davidian M
    Stat Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(4):640-661. PubMed ID: 25620840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeated split sample validation to assess logistic regression and recursive partitioning: an application to the prediction of cognitive impairment.
    James KE; White RF; Kraemer HC
    Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):3019-35. PubMed ID: 16149128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. C-learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.
    Zhang B; Zhang M
    Biometrics; 2018 Sep; 74(3):891-899. PubMed ID: 29228509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quint: An R package for the identification of subgroups of clients who differ in which treatment alternative is best for them.
    Dusseldorp E; Doove L; Mechelen Iv
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Jun; 48(2):650-63. PubMed ID: 26092391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Image compression using binary space partitioning trees.
    Radha H; Vetterli M; Leonardi R
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 1996; 5(12):1610-24. PubMed ID: 18290079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Subgroup identification based on differential effect search--a recursive partitioning method for establishing response to treatment in patient subpopulations.
    Lipkovich I; Dmitrienko A; Denne J; Enas G
    Stat Med; 2011 Sep; 30(21):2601-21. PubMed ID: 21786278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactive Q-learning for Quantiles.
    Linn KA; Laber EB; Stefanski LA
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2017; 112(518):638-649. PubMed ID: 28890584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Look before you leap: systematic evaluation of tree-based statistical methods in subgroup identification.
    Liu Y; Ma X; Zhang D; Geng L; Wang X; Zheng W; Chen MH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1082-1102. PubMed ID: 30859903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.